| Author | Artifact Sets Help Section |
|---|
It would be great if the admins could add what the set gives you from raw parameters in Help Section<Artifacts<Sets. At the moment, we have to click on each individual artifact to see what parameters are granted upon equipping the artifact. Now, the bonus for wearing complete sets is displayed, but not the raw parameters.
For reference, here is the link to the help section where only bonus parameters are shown:
https://www.lordswm.com/help.php?section=10 |
Oops wrong link. Here is the correct one:
https://www.lordswm.com/help.php?section=40 |
That would be good!
+1 |
| +1 |
How would you determine that though?
Take temporal set: say you have might and magic sets, so that's minimum two separate sets. But then what should each include? Should might wear dagger or shield? Bow or cloak?
What's about magic? Shield or scroll? Which rings? As of now it's probably not even complete because it has only 3 armor pieces + off hand that make sense for magic, and maybe the temporal signet ring for defense.
Then of course multiple variations of builds will incur variations in individual arts (offense or defense might or hybrids) so just 2 sets is already a simplification. |
for Slust:
Not all is perfect in the world, haha. I completely understand what you are saying. For the sets that contain no variation, it would definitely be helpful. For the sets with optional shield/daggers and incomplete sets, it would be a work in progress. |
Hmm. Maybe some kind of demo screen would be cool like the demo talent wheel.
Basically some kind of sandbox for any arts in the game. |
| After looking at the page more, I think it might be useful to display the different parameters beside each item in the list? It would be simple math to just add up a bunch of single digit numbers, especially when artifacts can be mixed and matched for sets like temporal. |
After looking at the page more, I think it might be useful to display the different parameters beside each item in the list?
Not sure that would look right tbh, especially considering the number of arts in temporal. |
