Author | the difficulty of tg |
i know that the difficulty decreases if lost with fsp over 0.3 but what will happen if i lose with lower fsp say 0.14
i have changed the faction and want to increase the fsp in it and tried thief and losing badly will it decrease my difficulty or not?? |
i know that the difficulty decreases if lost with fsp over 0.3
As you said, the difficulty decreases if you get at least 0.3 fsp. Otherwise it doesn't decrease. |
no one knows for sure if that 0.3 (0.33 with ABC) rule is still valid. soo many things has changed since Arctic shared that info.
rule of thumb : if using a low fsl faction, better load some arts to compansate or use skill potion ( yes, it works in solo ambushes now, even versus caravans ) |
[q]or use skill potion[/q]
does it work in caravans?? sure of that?? |
Yes, PoS works in caravans, you will get fsl10 |
thank you for the information |
Topic moved from "General game forum" to "Queries and help". |
no one knows for sure if that 0.3 (0.33 with ABC) rule is still valid. soo many things has changed since Arctic shared that info.
Arctic himself said that lower limit was NOT coded. And he didn't know how that myth came to be.
The thing is: let's say you get 0,25 fsp. That means you were heavily crushed. So next time, maybe the 1021 bows drop to 1014. And the stack of 20 Angels is the same. So you obviously get crushed again. |
for Lord Syrian:
so it does get decreased when we lose badly right?? |
Yes, but you'll barely feel it. |
It decreases always when you lose, and increases always on win, no? Logic.
No matter how bad or well.
And yes, Idk who made up the 0.3 thing, always sounded weird when I read it. |
It can be easily tested. For example if I get 2 fsp for a win and then I lose for 0.7 fsp, usually next win gives me fsp below 2. If difficulty of caravan is X, I would say that the higher X is, the higher is your fsp reward for win. So if I win for 2 fsp, then lose for 0.25 fsp and next time I win for 2.03 fsp, I think there is not any decrease or it is negligible. |
Sorry for double post but I found the exact case. Let's compare a bit
http://prntscr.com/hiiorx
this are three ambushes
1st. was win for 1.95 fsp
https://www.lordswm.com/battle.php?lastturn=-3&warid=867525031
2nd was loss for 0.24 fsp
https://www.lordswm.com/battle.php?lastturn=-3&warid=867528871
3rd was win for 1.95 fsp
https://www.lordswm.com/battle.php?lastturn=-3&warid=867613470
Now it would be good to find 2 ambushes won in a row, where first gave me 1.95 fsp and 2nd gave me more, so we can say that 0.24 loss decreased my difficulty (at least slightly). It can be easy because right after 3rd one I won and got 1.97 fsp
https://www.lordswm.com/battle.php?lastturn=-3&warid=867614632
But still doesn't have to do a judgement. Because it can happen that even if you win 2 in row, you can still get almost the same fsp. I won't send another links but I checked a row of 5 wins. fsp reward was this:
1.9
1.91
1.91
1.94
1.95
Somewhere else I found 1.99 twice in a row, so this was not so good example. In general, for my CL and TG fsp increases around 0.015 per win, but there is a little variation - maybe random or it simply depends on enemy army. But it is increasing almost linearly by winning (or maybe if I didn't play with enchated sword, I would get only 1.8 fsp on average and there every win would not increase my fsp reward by 0.015 but 0.012 or whatever...).
Nevermind, what is really important, good loss decreases the X (and fsp reward too) greatly.
For example these are 4 ambushes following each other:
https://www.lordswm.com/battle.php?lastturn=-3&warid=865932045
https://www.lordswm.com/battle.php?lastturn=-3&warid=865932374
https://www.lordswm.com/battle.php?lastturn=-3&warid=865932782
https://www.lordswm.com/battle.php?lastturn=-3&warid=866047276
so even 0.35 loss got me back where I was 2 wins ago (while 0.24 got me back where I was 1 win ago, if even that)
However I also sow 1.96, 1.98, 0.81 and then 1.96 ;)
Now I got 1.99, 2.01, 0.90 and 1.99
To me it seems like even great loss is almost the same as 0.35 loss or the difference is very small |