Forums-->Ideas and suggestions-->
1|2|3
| Author | I invite admins to prove their word. add a (?) button to WG errand lines. |
|---|
as u can guess, (?) button reveals the battle (from the event) how and by whom that specific erramd is won.
button appears only after errand is tried and lost.
hitting (?) button drops 1 diamond from account balance, if no diamond, then 15k gold ;)
Player banned by moderator Lord STB until 2016-02-08 08:59:55 // LR2 I&S / Use a title that briefly describes your idea/suggestion. | | Would you really spend 15K Golds to see how another guy won that specific WG Errand? | Interesting idea - and should be straight forward enough for them to implement since the set up must have to have called up the data from that battle.
Giving it a diamond price encourages donations which is good - though 1 diamond is too much. Perhaps it could be like golden cards - where you purchase a certain number of reveals - that way you could keep the diamond price - but adjust it so that each reveal of the levels was realistic.
Certainly this would clarify if it was winnable or not - which would stop at least some of the differing of opinions on the forums.
Of course we all know that the devs never read this - and so has absolutely no chance of being implemented - but why not do it - if it is expensive enough - no substantive negative impact as I can see so +1 from me | | +100000 | | I like this a lot, even if I wouldn't use it! :p | This is the best idea here so far.
It is achievable, marketable, good for some and bad for none.
For some battles i would love to see how exactly somebody managed to win (and then either feel stupid for not thinking of that strategy myself, or be amazed by how much luck somebody can have.) | I am thinking about another option: after you win a WG errand with 3 star, you will have the option to see how and by whom that specific erramd is won.
it would be interesting, too. | | Too bad this decent idea is brought forward by such a trash title. Could you be a little bit more provocative next time ? | Too bad this decent idea is brought forward by such a trash title.
Indeed. Very good idea that would shut down whiners ^^
+1 | Could you be a little bit more provocative next time ?
tried my best to be as much provocative as possible because
Of course we all know that the devs never read this - and so has absolutely no chance of being implemented
about ipsen's question
Would you really spend 15K Golds to see how another guy won that specific WG Errand?
depends on how much Im annoyed from a terrible loss. beside that, I strongly believe decent education deserves some decent price tag. | What about an crazy idea as such, this being a free new feature? Since it doesn't hold substancial trading value.
Liuker's idea is also a better one.
If we're willing to pay for this level of content, what will be next? Pay to reveal tournament results? Pay to receive Mc informations, pay to have any question answered, from Q&H?
And what about a few years later, what kind of crazier outcomes might happen?
Already heard about the boiling frog experiment? This idea is the very core about what shouldn't ever happen. | for Angel of Death:
The point is you pay for things that give you an advantage - that is accepted - all arts fit this description
Being able to review a battle to give you a tactical advantage is currently not accepted (battle review not available during PoT events etc)
This suggestion would make information available for benefit at a price. I see what ou are saying about the boiling frog experiment (thanks I had forgotton about that one) though the reality of this is severley questionable the moral message is sound.
On a side note - heard of the levitating frog experiment - actually real and far more cool (literally)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andre_Geim | How far is the route between pay to have an advantage and pay to win actually is?
Being able to review a battle to give you a tactical advantage is currently not accepted Special emphasis on 'currently' word.
The boiling frog is the essence of a translation of doctrination meaning, which means would lead into slowly distortion of reality into making a new one possible. In another words, it will be s slowly process where the players will have to pay more for features that once were free of charge.
This suggestion would make information available for benefit at a price.
We don't need to pay in order to watch top records from mg, hg, tournaments once over, so why we'll need to pay for being able to review a battle now?
I fully understand that there's some source of heated arguments about the possibility of some WG battles were or not possible to realize, which leads some players to question the authenticity of the currently WG system, however will this fragile emotional stance justify a huge leap backwards?
I can safely say if an feature like this be aproved I would be the first person to quit the game for good.
Let's compare apples with apples here, with 20 diamonds or 50k, it's possible to purchase ABC for 30 days, which offers many advantages, one of them is to switch the currently too hard WG battle. Would 15k be enough to roll a dice to see someone possibility triggering several luck strikes in arrow or a very specific build to win a battle, which could've been simply switched.
Ok, let's go with "but I want to see if it's possible or not, plus I could learn new tactics and gameplay," then I politely ask, why it cannot be a free new feature? Why it must cost 1 diamond? | Would you really spend 15K Golds to see how another guy won that specific WG Errand?
depends on how much Im annoyed from a terrible loss. beside that, I strongly believe decent education deserves some decent price tag.
Hmm okay, good point Tbh.
I've also had those close WG Missions which maddened me after losing and tried again and again and still lost. :P
I guess Fun/Ambition is relevant here. | 15k. Nope.
+1 to the Idea.
The cost could be the inability to do that mission once the tactic / battle has been viewed and / or -0.25 WG Points. | Of course we all know that the devs never read this - and so has absolutely no chance of being implemented - but why not do it - if it is expensive enough - no substantive negative impact as I can see so +1 from me
You are absolute, open up your mind a little. Or perhaps you are some kind of superhuman entity and know that devs never read this, in which case I am sorry. However, you should know that not everyone has the same abilities, so kindly don't say things like "we all know that", because it is missleading, thanks ! | for Lord Hallion91:
I am sorry for putting something which is in fact strong conjecture, and I believe commonly accepted by the community as likely to be true as knowledge. You are correct I do not "know" however wrote this regrettable inaccuracy as I felt it was likely to be sufficiently close to the truth to warrant the easier phraseology.
I', sorry you were so easily misled by this information. I shall of course rephrase to guve complete clarity for you.
Of course we all strongly suspect that the devs never read this (since they do not read english, have implemented a sufficiently small number of things from this forum to be negligible and do not even have time to put up official announcements in English of most events) - and so has an extremely low chance of being implemented from this forum directly unless someone translates and posts on the russian forum - but why not do it - if it is not so super cheap as to be a joke - so a balance of expensive enough tp put some, but not all off - no substantive negative impact as I can see so +1 from me
i hope that reflects my thinking better and is more accurate
Obviously as you can see, me overly polarising my statements as factual rather than supersition, significantly masks my overall message | We don't need to pay in order to watch top records from mg, hg, tournaments once over, so why we'll need to pay for being able to review a battle now?
I have to question the same thing.
Why do you guys think paying 1 diamond is okay for this? Is that supposed to be an incentive for admins to implement this? Because i cannot justify such a thing otherwise.
If you do think 15k is reasonable price for this, then why don't we introduce such system for other services that we have been using everyday in exchange for obtaining more admins' attention? | Is that supposed to be an incentive for admins to implement this?
short answer : yes
long answer for the bored, with ample time to read :
anyone remember good old travel scripts when we were at .com ?
they were quite cheap, (= zero gold) and fairly effective.
admins implemented some serious counter measures to render any travel script useless (as I heard from script writers, personaly no idea about technical aspect) hence they can sell their mounts.
price of heal potion decreased considerably some months ago
even before that, price of oblivion ZERO'ed (in conjuction with talent bar)
I take these as signs. admins started to have/like/want small price tag (diamond / gold) commodities.
then why don't we introduce such system for other services that we have been using everyday in exchange for obtaining more admins' attention?
wait for my next "bright" idea V_V. expecting it would be even less popular than this one, yet, have almost same chance to be implemented :d
--
noticed another post that requires some more time wasting :p
We don't need to pay in order to watch top records from mg, hg, tournaments once over,
well, Angel of Death again mixing apples and bananas.
HG and MG records are done by gold power,
one rents the best enhance hunter set (relative to level) then tries. of course, letting old record accessible is good marketing strategy, fuels competition, enables to burn more and more gold.
tourney play is generaly kept hidden while tourney is going on.
after finish, since no effect to results, they are accessible, to satify the publics curiocity.
remember, repeating tourneys like PoT has some tiny differences in itself. even if one memorise every single detail of a past winner, he/she may not be succesful in next "same" tourney (to get into top 100 etc) ;)
to see someone possibility triggering several luck strikes in arrow or a very specific build to win a battle, which could've been simply switched.
well, at lvl 9, talent/army variations are limited. above 14, game becomes more interesting.
those like me, without patience to scroll / search tons of data (or dont want a headache caused by a process called thinking) may be willing to pay just to achieve some very simple info, fast and easy ;)
if an feature like this be aproved I would be the first person to quit the game for good.
guess many will burst into tears in forums, including me. losing you would be such a hard blow. consider again !!
--
now a confession : I would LOVE to see this feature be implemented for FREE. It would help all servers play quality increase. | +1
But 1 diamonds seems like a lot. Perhaps for a decreased price. |
1|2|3Back to topics list
|
