| Author | MG records - a joke? |
|---|
| Why are other level players being included in my level records? |
| They aren't. |
| http://prntscr.com/79x1z9 |
| The way it is right now is a bit confusing. Either the records are imperfect or that the way they are displayed is different. |
same problem here
I have done wizards 26 vaguard
level 11
but I din get that record either |
| This is just sucking way of record keeping, I would have had 2-3 more records but those lower level player are just stealing my level 10 record for no reason, what is the use of such imperfect record keeping? |
| Just give it some time, maybe a day or 2 to settle in, it was just implemented and don't expect everything to be in tip top form straight on.. Besides since they're no use in keeping such "imperfect records", u don't need to be too concerned with it. |
Guess they somehow made it so that the level 10 record page shows records of all people in level 10 or below
So if a level 9 record and the level 10 record is equal, they might show the level 9 record holder instead
And I guess the record only includes the MG battles after the recent update, since it seems most of the record holders are still on the same CL as their records
(If it includes all-time records, a lot of the record holders will be of much higher levels and/or inactive) |
This is just sucking way of record keeping, I would have had 2-3 more records but those lower level player are just stealing my level 10 record for no reason, what is the use of such imperfect record keeping?
if lower level is "stealing" your record then you're not gonna keep it for long time anyway... |
no joke
It just shows the current records, but only including quests won after the update.
Maybe this will be changed later to also include old battles, probably not.
As long as only the "new" battles will be included, then awesome1993 will never get the record to his name for the awesome achievement of beating vanguard of wizzards 26 at combat level 11.
Since he already won 27 (also before the update) he will not get a record until he beats 28 as well. |
Guess they somehow made it so that the level 10 record page shows records of all people in level 10 or below
It should remain like that. It is a better way of record keeping.
if lower level is "stealing" your record then you're not gonna keep it for long time anyway... |
It only includes latest records.
And it shows the highest record set from anyone your lvl or lower. It will change since at a certain level you can win higher difficulties than a lower level, you just need to win. Even at hunter's guild there is such a thing at some levels. |
As long as only the "new" battles will be included, then awesome1993 will never get the record to his name for the awesome achievement of beating vanguard of wizzards 26 at combat level 11.
Since he already won 27 (also before the update) he will not get a record until he beats 28 as well.
Super
then will wait for it to happen |
| The reason the old battles are not being included is probably because of the ballista event. |
