Forums-->Queries and help-->
| Author | Rules regarding incomplete castles |
|---|
3.16. Staged combats leading one of the parties to losing a priori will be punished for. A staged combat by definition is one where: Any one of the parties or party members intentionally loses to the other for any reason different from having technical problems with access to the game; combats with not full armies (except for cases when falling into thief ambushes), unless it is a combat against a character of lower level, in which case highest tier creatures may be not recruited; giveaway combats in which players intentionally move their troops to become an easy target to opponent without any tactical interest (which may be consulted with any players of same combat level). Instigation to losing a combat and promising to lose a combat is also forbidden.
From the above rule I assume double ambushes aren't an exception.
I was involved in a few random double ambushes with a lvl 14 necro who did not have skel dragons nor any upgraded. I reported him and he has penalized.
https://www.lordswm.com/forum_messages.php?tid=2020736
A few days later he sent me a PM with a link and his penalty was revoked.
http://hwmforum.ru/forum_messages.pl?id=10036
My questions here are:
1. Have the rules been changed or do we have a different understanding of the rules?
2. What are the different battles I can do with incomplete castles?
3. What is this forum? (http://hwmforum.ru/forum_messages.pl?id=10036)
P.S I am not trying to question mods action but just looking for clarity on rules. | | He appologized and got payback. | for Lord Hallion91:
From translation:
Board Composition: zapal, Ael Sel, Pekingese considering your appeal, a panel of a 3-man came to the conclusion that the fine is incorrect. Penalty player Ivan Kozak- 05.13.21 fifty-seven past six p.m.: Player fined 5,000 gold. / / Staged combat, combats with not full armies; warid = 536329432 given, as we can see from the report, for fighting with incomplete armies. however, HIG is no rule that prohibits involvement with incomplete armies (no ups) is in HS. As an example, a similar application is reviewed in favor of the participant with incomplete armies. http://www.heroeswm.ru/forum_messages.php?tid=2025169 (A guardian makes it clear that this is not a violation.) is another example. http://www.heroeswm. ru / forum_messages.php? tid = 1790557 (answer the head of a clan rangers also points to the fact that without ups in the GW fight you can). Based on the lack of rules, as well as confirmation of the absence of punishment for this game by the executive bodies (the caretakers and guardians ), the penalty is incorrect and requires a rollback.
Doesn't seem like he got it back just by apologizing. | 1. the rule was softend bby the ICC before the merge but some how RU and COM keepers treating it differently.
2. The rule has changed again to make it more clear for both parties thief and/or ranger or both fine.
3. that is an alt forum form the RU jury clan (https://www.lordswm.com/clan_info.php?id=6500) that will look after the fine is given and the player thinks it is given wrongly
And here is the new rule to make it clear to all :)
3.16. Staged combats leading one of the parties to losing a priori will be punished for. A staged combat by definition is one where: Any one of the parties or party members intentionally loses to the other for any reason different from having technical problems with access to the game; combats with not full armies (except thief and/or ranger encounters), unless it is a combat against a character of lower level, in which case highest tier creatures may be not recruited; giveaway combats in which players intentionally move their troops to become an easy target to opponent without any tactical interest (which may be consulted with any players of same combat level). Instigation to losing a combat and promising to lose a combat is also forbidden.
Player banned by moderator Edwin until 2013-09-11 23:34:28 // 3. that is an alt forum fRom the RU jury clan(nice typo -_-) | Thanks Ed)
So everything should be fine as long as we have just enough castle constructions to be able to set up an ambush, right? (upgrades not required either)
Correct me if I'm wrong, else you can lock it.
Thanks :-) | right
And you can close it your self below this topic ;) | | closed by Purgatory (2013-09-12 00:02:14) |
|---|
Back to topics list
|
