| Author | Account Sitting |
|---|
So in this basically, if one is busy for a while (Atleast 3 days), he/she can have an account sitter, who will log in to his/her account by his own password but the username on the account being sat.
The Account Sitter can -
>>Enroll
>>Do Hunts
>>Change Recruiting/Talents
The Account Sitter can't -
>>Make any transfers
>>Buy/Sell Arts on the Market
>>Join Battles in which his own account is
>>Read/Write Private Mails
>>Post on Forums/Chat
It will be useful for people in such cases -
>>Vacations
>>Exams
>>Health Problems
>>Work
>>Internet Problems
This will be quite useful, but is NOT a necessity. |
Also, If the account of 'x' is being sitted by 'y', then x cannot log in until 3 days, and there will be a fees/day. Let's say 'z' gold.
So if y sits for x for 10 days, x will pay y 10z gold. |
| great idea. i agree |
| -1 |
+1
but not for hunts and not for buying arts/resources on map - enroll only. |
| good one ayan but its a copy and lords is all about activity |
good one ayan but its a copy and lords is all about activity
I agree. Lords don't need it. If you can't log in everyday, just don't do that, you won't lose anything. You may gain nothing either. But, still, is better you play for your own than you pay a sitter to enroll and do some hunts for you. The game would lose the funny part, imo.
So, -1. |
-1
It is not like other games where you must log in many times per day, pay a lot of real money too keap your account alive. If you can t log in for a day, month or year you lose nothing here. So big -1. |
| +1,nice idea but you copied it from tribal wars, |
thinking of possibility, this can make multi in disguise. one can make 10 another account and sit them for his purpose, like invitation program or other.
Also, If the account of 'x' is being sitted by 'y', then x cannot log in until 3 days, and there will be a fees/day. Let's say 'z' gold.
So if y sits for x for 10 days, x will pay y 10z gold.
imagine one player have 20 account to tend. looking like financial assist right ? |
- 1
this is not travian, if you do not log in for over a month, there is no problem and you can just continue where you left off. |
In the other game one cannot sit more than 2 accounts so there would not be so big problem with multis.
Some changes are required too to sign multies at the time of opening account. Then it would be your rightful additional account and you would not get paid for invitation too. |
-1, No such need.
The hunts and enrolls don't go away if you don't do them. Come back after 6 months and you'll find them just as you've left them. |
Good idea.
If you're away from game for months, you pay someone 10 or 15 000 gold and when you come back you have about 30 000 or more gold more than when you went away because this socalled "sitter" has enrolled reguraly. But 3 days is too few. This is profitable only when you're away atleast a week.
And I agree with BrownBear - only enroll, no hunts.
And also, 50% of profit, that "sitter" makes, should go automatically to him, when the account owner comes back.
But still, +1 |
| -1 |
+/-
i don't know, too many cheating risks...
still, i think this one is better than the suggestion at
https://www.lordswm.com/forum_messages.php?tid=1916305
like i said in that thread:
what would be nice, is that with each enroll you build up some kind of vacation time, like in RL.
same idea (you can take a break without losing income), but without the need for other players, so less chance of a cheating network |
-1
i played tr@vian for years, they have sitters
it is a perfect opportunity for cheaters and multis
it is 100% sure people will use that to provide benefits for their main accounts
you can be sure of that
in my last server, when i resign from tr@vian, i new a guy who had 24 multiaccounts
lords doesnt needd sitters, as someone already says here, if you dont log for 10 days, nothing happens, no damage done
no need to complicate things and introduce more cheater options |
its ridiculous idea
-1 |
| -1 |
+\-
A lot of cheating might occur |
