| Author | Staged Combat |
|---|
1. Link to Battle - 3 Player Battle Everyone for Oneself
https://www.lordswm.com/warlog.php?warid=490051193
https://www.lordswm.com/battlechat.php?warid=22051193
2. Participants
a. ihateu - Victor and Staged Combat Participant
https://www.lordswm.com/pl_info.php?id=4551752
b. conna - Deliberate Loser and Staged Combat Participant
https://www.lordswm.com/pl_info.php?id=4514931
c. Man-O-War - Loser and in no way involved in the staged combat
Scenario
conna and ihateu secretly formed an alliance for the everyone vs everyone battle. My multi Man-O-War was quickly beaten from this arrangement. I'm fine with this and up until this point there was no foul.
After my multi was defeated the battle became rigged with a pre determined winner and loser. Also the second place winner conna was allowed to get extra kills before being defeated.
Evidence of cheating
1. From watching battle
a. After Man-O-War was defeated conna moved 2 of his 3 remaining stacks recklessly so they would quickly perish
b. ihateu repeatedly pressed the "wait" button so he would lose a few units from conna's druids
2. From the Battle Chat (it may also be useful to watch the battle and see how the comments relate to the battle at that moment)
Line 46
Line 47
Line 50
Line 51
Line 53
Line 56
Line 57
Again I want to emphasise that I had no problem with the double teaming and my quick elimination from the battle. But the rules expect of those who form an alliance and then run out of opponents, to then "duke it out" to the best of their ability. That certainly did not take place in this combat.
Cheers |
Well these 2 i.e. ihateu and conna, have done it again.
This time conna was allowed to win thanks to ihateu repeatedly pressing the wait button.
https://www.lordswm.com/warlog.php?warid=490053967
It needs to be said that ihateu and conna do nothing wrong until the other participants of the everyone for themself battle were beaten. Then they rig the combat by ensuring each take turns in winning the combat.
I don't believe the other participants i.e. 3rd and 4th placegetters of the combat were in on the deal.
Cheers |
My apologies
The second comment was unintentionally posted by my multi. I shall try to ensure it does not happen again.
Cheers |
| closed by Georgia (2010-06-05 23:12:29) |
|---|
