| Author | Hunter records |
|---|
| What i don't like about hunter records is if the 1st place record is (for example 100 forest keepers) and i beat 100 forest keepers i won't be 1st place i will be 2nd. or if all 3 places are 100 forest keepers, and i beat 100 fks, i will not even show up on the record table. i think it would be smarter if u get the 1st place in that situation. |
| And how is this fair to the person that was the first person ever to do that 100 fk hunt? The current situation recognises not only the record, but the first 3 people to have done it. |
And how is this fair to the person that was the first person ever to do that 100 fk hunt?
yes he was first, but then when somebody else does it, the record is beaten. the 1st person is not the record holder anymore since someone else can do it too. |
How is a record beat when other people can only reach the same level and not surpass it?
He still holds the record for being the first person ever to win 100 fks no matter how many times other people win 100 fks until someone can actually win 101 fks |
| "Record" IMHO: The BEST result, and the FIRST to obtain it :) |
but then when somebody else does it, the record is EQUALLED.
Could have copied the same strategy too, so with this possibility if they are 'copying' something they are not setting anything 'new' so why should they be given a 'new' record?
Take for example in formula 1 - if two drivers get exactly the same time (to 0.000 [thousandth of a second]), than the person who does it first gets the position infront.
Also another thing - as the server gets older, more people get elements/enchanted weapons, which can then be loaned for the purpose of record hunts, effectively making it easier to do what someone has previously done, why should someone who has it easier also be placed infront of someone who has already done the exact same thing just under harder circumstances? |
bad idea.
these records with 3 times the same score have probably been done by a lot more than 3 players.
for exemple 757 goblins is relatively easy for level5 knights, and next hunt (984) extremely hard.
maybe 20 or 30 players have already defeated these 757 goblins.
why would you have a hunt record by doing the same thing than all these players?
and what would you think if you had the 1st place in a hunt, and then 1 month later you still have the 1st place, but you are no more in the records list because 3 other players defeated the same ammount of monsters than you? |
