Forums-->Off-game forum-->
1|2
| Author | Our Top 3 vs Russian Server Top 3 |
|---|
| Ok people who do you think would win | | Russians, due to much more skillpoints in the other factions and guilds, more playing experience due to Ages of playing and much better available arts. | | kusika, masterti and visao will bury them all .. :) I belive .. Long Live the Dark Elves, Long Live the English Server .. :) | | Guys i find this topic kinda offensive cuz we are all here to enjoy playing one good old game , not finding out which nationality is better . | | Hmm I think this is not about nationalities, just about abilities .. :) | | friendship will win and they will drink bear together. | | I agree with I_own_you_all | kusika, masterti and visao will bury them all .. :) I belive .. Long Live the Dark Elves, Long Live the English Server .. :)
I think Kusika is playing DE just to receive more xp because DE are good at thieving (maybe he's aiming for the 1st place), but he was a wizard. And in a group battle DE's are one of the first killed players... and wizards can be the last - I saw one with LS versus Antos.. LS was soo close to win with mana recovery! ). And.. ViSao was a barbarian. BTW, knights and Wizards are very good in GB's ( And the others too, but demons and DEs are dying faster ). I didn't see too many necros and elves.. and about barbarians, I think they are better in duels than GB at high levels because they can be killed rather fast. | | Not just Demons and DEs, but also Elves .. but Yeahh KUSIKA is Identical with Magic ... :) MasterTI with might (DE) and Visao with Barbarians .. :) I think they are the best pair we have for now .. :) | | i say russian win because visao dont have 7 tier troops | | russians,even though if we have the same stuff that they have we would still get our butts kciked,just look at wepx,his exp is more than 3 times more than MTI ,and he have about 2 factions in level 9 racil and the third in 8, | | yea but exp doesn't give any 'in-game' advantage, so it wouldn't matter if he had 400x more exp | Did you ever see wepx's enchanted art set? unbeatable :/
Sorry, but our server's best have no chance against .ru bests. | for lcorndogl:
more exp means more game ,more games mean more experinxce in game play,yes it is tru that they can be even in all advangates but what if master TI screw up in a move i`m sure that wepx can intispate 5 turns upwards from his game experance | While not implying in any way about the names (both here and .ru) mentioned in any of the posts, I really can't relate to how 'top' players are based on combat levels and exp, since we earn exp/fsp and what have you even when we lose in all battles.
If a 'lousy' player were to play 18 hours a day, but loses most of his battles, he would still have a higher combat level and exp after 1 month than a better player who wins most of his battles, but can only play 30-60 minutes a day.
In the same vein, if 2 players are of equal standard, but 1 plays as a Wiz/Knight/Necro etc (just stating examples, not saying they are weak factions), compared to the other who plays as a DE, than it's only natural that the DE player will have a higher winning %, higher combat level and exp, if they both play the same number of hours after say, 1 year, since it's already a fact that DE are more suited for most of the battles like TG, hunts etc, in this game. Example: DE have the easiest TG caravans of all the factions, a fact pointed out by a top player (can't remember who) in the forums.
Recently, I received a PM from a buddy. He saw some of my TGs and though I was wearing medium arts, he saw that I don't have a great winning % and was struggling to wins my ambushes. He suggested that I changed to a DE or Elf as he (he's an Elf) was winning most of his TGs wearing min arts (!). He also plays as a DE and noted that my knight caravans are so much 'harder' than those he faces as an Elf and DE.
Unless we have 2 players who play the same faction, same number of hours, and does the same number of same type battles, it's almost impossible to judge a player merely from one's combat level and exp, etc.
So basically, I believe that combat level, exp, etc, have nothing to do with how good a player is... or isn't.
*** Again I say, this post don't imply that I'm saying that our top players are no good. On the contrary, i think they are all great players. This post are just my general observation of the game, as a whole *** | Its easy to see that if a player is good or bad as you state here from victories and defeats.
Although wpek has 7:1 he mainly fought hunts and therefor he will not be very good in duels or gb. | hmm, level 1 kusika, Marked_one and ViSao vs level 1 Wpek/Shrek, Crag_Hack and Noldor
all same faction with same factions points and stats, in other words, all are same. This is fairer | What is the aim of this fair test?
To study the relationship between strength of .com and strength of .ru
--
What is the trend of strength of .com?
decrease
--
What is your inference?
Because admins cares .ru more than .com, leaving .com untouched
--
In other investigation, .com beats .ru, what is your inference?
Because .com player is more pro than .ru
--
I'm not flooding, but lack of updates is the cause why .com is a lesser server compared to .ru | | | Yeahh that will be nice to see those players in combat .. :) M-1 with DE that will be good .. :) And I think Master-TI should go back to Necros .. his first Faction .. :) |
1|2Back to topics list
|
