| Author | A view of this admin match |
|---|
http://www.heroeswm.com/warlog.php?lt=-1&warid=725015
So who thinks that the admin are doing the right thing in this 3,3 vs 2,2?
Or who feels that the admin are cheating by using 10 druids 3 elven bowmen in the match ? |
Totally fair. Alexander was lvl 2, and fought with the means he had available. ^_^
Now, who thinks the lvl 3's were cheating by beating on lower levels? |
For hmkoh: no need to make new topic about this that their job to make this game still under control coz admin have responbility to take control the game and give punish to people who make something unfair.
If the battle 2(lv3)vs 2(lv3) and then admin you druid in battle you can said admin cheating but for people who make battle 2(lv3)vs 2(lv2) admin only give punish to him. |
| i say w00t, about time admins did something to stop this :) |
a good action indeed,
they actually should have taken 10 treefolk..... |
1
I think Alexander did it right. I think it is the good answer for all numerous 4(lvl)- 2(lvl) battles.
My grats! Nice fight=) |
ofcours it is good punishment to thous hu make such battles, but it has more minuses then pluses - its shows that administration and moderators can do enething they like and lowers low avtoritet of their, and once again administration listened to weeping on forum and this is not good, now will be only more weeping, now i m only hope there will not be some nonsens like AO at .ru server :(
P.S. unfair random and creatures from the hunt hurt me, can someone give me more troops to show them justis?! |
7.
Moderators? You are wrong :)
And admins do not play this game - this battle is exception and a good one. |
| life unfair, isn't.. dont go in such battle and stop complain |
for Huntress:
and there i m wrong? i know hi administrator, but i m here sayng if administrator can go to any battle and judge everione like somekind of robingood then why moderator can not ban someone only becous hi dont like him? this only shows coruption in the Empire.
Ocfourse it is low to create that kind of battle but no one is driged in them, they battle by free will and it is not the right fing to brake rules becous of that, i m sayng than both fings are wrong at same. |
moderator can not ban someone only becous hi dont like him
He can do that in any game or other project. But they just don't do that. |
Mr. Ivor, Please consider this.
5.1. Administration's actions and decisions are not subject to discussion.
5.2. A moderator can be wrong. If you suspect he or she is, c.f. par.1.5.
1.5. Moderator's actions can be disputed by putting in an application to the game Secretary (thread link and detailed description of the application cause required).
http://www.heroeswm.com/pl_info.php?id=4
If you are unhappy with a moderator's action, you can always appeal it.
If you are unhappy with an Administrator's action, why are playing this game? |
for Arctic:
not i started discution, but if u writting i will answer - sometimes i doubt that appelation will work, and hu will see it? the same moderator that banned? or his friends?
i m not unhappy whit admins, and i do not wonna argue thit them or something like that, but some actions looks very bad, so i just playng and giving my opinion and hope that will not be banned becouse then i belive will not find the true |
Is just like a police tries to commit a crime in order to catch a thief?
Or someone killing another just cos he steals someone...
You dun cheat in order to show justice.... |
13.
All appeals are considered by administration.
If you have really not done anything wrong you should not fear such things. |
for Ivor:
I appreciate your concern, let me post this message as a player, not as a moderator.
Moderators have quite limited powers in this game. They help to maintain order at the forum or in chat. In all other aspects, they are ordinary players, and there are no features available to them that wouldn't be available to other players.
Moderators still have to obey to the rules, there is even an additional section for them, besides the general game rules created for all players (which moderators are, too.) One of them is:
5.3. A moderator must be impartial.
Therefore, this game does not tolerate any wilfulness of moderators in regard to anyone else. Appeals on moderators are analyzed by the Administration itself. |
