| Author | Portal of time |
|---|
| I find random partners at later levels are much more reliable than those earlier ones. Too late for me though as I lost too many at the early levels. The max wins I can have is now 38 :-( |
| for bp99: for real. i found one guy for 45 and 50. much chill that way |
I'm sorry but I'm a little confused, surely balance is ultimately about the overall "power" of the enemy more so than what it is made up of. An opponent of just tier 1 but too many is more of a problem than one having tier 7 but not many.
for Lord MilesTeg:
I lost first try at level 3 due to the tier 7 creatures. Also there were no high stacks of tier 1 or 2 etc. on the lower levels, even after level 15 the lower stacks were only 30+. You really are stretching it by calling a stack of 2 of tier 7 balanced in "power" to a stack of 20+ of tier 1 or 2.
Also take note that at the start you do not have that many crystals as well to even have a decent army. |
for Lawton:
You really are stretching it by calling a stack of 2 of tier 7 balanced in "power" to a stack of 20+ of tier 1 or 2.
Please do not suggest me to saying something I did not. Of course with those specific numbers you mention the balance would not be correct, those are your words not mine. I simply stated that balance is a factor of tier AND number, and that neither in isolation dominate the other. Your earlier post was suggesting that tier is pretty much the only factor, to this I disagree.
If I am to judge balance I will look at the evidence in totality, not isolated pieces. This means the tier, the number, the relative strength of a character, the quality of arts equipped, the tactical skill of the person and the record that ultimately was achieved. This then also needs to be put in check with the fact that the armies are generated on RNG, and so will occasionally stumble on a stronger build that counters your set up. It is reasonable to expect to lose every so often. If the risk of loss was not there, then this would diminish the accomplishment from winning.
Your record is one loss, the one to which you decried imbalance, all others have been won without (I assume from the battles you shared) using top arts. Granted you have played conservatively in terms of not pushing the levels, though equally you have been conservative with arts, so these balance to some extent.
As such to me the evidence from your own log, is that of general balance, I see no reason for concern on the balance of what I can see. Of course if you increase the sample size to many many players and see lots of losses when they have not pushed the levels, then fair enough. I am however not holding my breath. |
| finished lv50. on last try...dancing :D |
https://www.lordswm.com/war.php?lt=-1&warid=1315896776&html5=1&show_for_all=Mba70d47161
Event was fun. Except the starting, where only defensive builds were playable. Never a fan of those battles. |
Please do not suggest me to saying something I did not. Of course with those specific numbers you mention the balance would not be correct, those are your words not mine. I simply stated that balance is a factor of tier AND number, and that neither in isolation dominate the other.
Yeah you did. You made an assumption that since tier 7 stacks appeared there also must be high stacks of low tiers to balance it out, which was not the case.
If I am to judge balance I will look at the evidence in totality
There hasn't been any balance in this game for ages, where have you been?
Your record is one loss, the one to which you decried imbalance, all others have been won without
Nope, I called the ones I won unbalanced as well, especially the one with 4 tier 7 creatures at level 3. The two examples I gave are ones I won both. You seem to think there must be balance when you have won it. Just because one won it does not mean it was also balanced.
As such to me the evidence from your own log, is that of general balance, I see no reason for concern on the balance of what I can see.
Since you have not even played any battles in this event, your sense of balance is unbalanced :D |
Nope, I called the ones I won unbalanced as well, especially the one with 4 tier 7 creatures at level 3. The two examples I gave are ones I won both. You seem to think there must be balance when you have won it. Just because one won it does not mean it was also balanced.
If you are capable of winning battles and losing battles, then the event is balanced. If you get stuck on a wave without any hope of finishing it despite infinite tries, then it is unbalanced. How else are you supposed to define balanced? Please shed some light on your thinking because I don't really understand your absurd claim to have won battles despite it being so unbalanced? |
Completed level 55 with 2230 crystals. Around 1350ish in rank. I thought I did well enough but only got a 39/39 event art.
How high has the bar been raised for good arts?! |
https://www.lordswm.com/art_info.php?id=mir_helmt2&uid=449370643&crc=i7e7e26685
Rank 282, 58 durability art lol.. Last few events I placed even lower but had above 70 durability arts. Don't know why there's such a big difference, should have just skipped this event. |
| And to rub salt in the wound, the maximum durability for arts is 90 this time |
| The event has finish but i still can't review other players battles? Anyone know when we will be able to watch them? |
| fun event. should play better next time |
The event has finish but i still can't review other players battles? Anyone know when we will be able to watch them?
sunday or monday they should be watchable, latest if something happens could be wednesday, we will see^^ |
| Or when the next event is announced |
for Galthran:
What was it before? |
What was it before?
Max durability was 80/80 in the last portal event where they gave worldwalker shield |
If you are capable of winning battles and losing battles, then the event is balanced. If you get stuck on a wave without any hope of finishing it despite infinite tries, then it is unbalanced. How else are you supposed to define balanced? Please shed some light on your thinking because I don't really understand your absurd claim to have won battles despite it being so unbalanced?
for virtual_vitrea: History is filled with battles that seemed impossible but was won. From the looks of you, you would call those battles "balanced" since they won.
Balance means that you have a fair chance, not that you keep hoping and even relying on luck and morale to even have a chance at it. If you find it balanced to immediately face 2 tier 7 creatures at level 2 and then even 4 of them on level 3, then it's best that you keep believing that because it would be a fool's errand otherwise. Winning has nothing to do with balance, it is clear you cannot grasp that. |
Rank 282, 58 durability art lol..
Rank 5000+ gives you 23 durability. So 20 times better rank than that only nets you a bit over double durability. And with max being 90 durability, 58 isn't even 2/3 of that. What a joke this has become. Even the awards have started to get skimped, bravo admins, I love the way you show appreciation towards your player base. |
| yeah the rewards for past 2 events have been tramp at best |
