| Author | Make hunt record be for max lvl X instead of only lvl X |
|---|
| I think that if a player gets a record on level 10 but have killed more than the record holder on level 11. The player should get both the level 10 and level 11 record. This seems only fair since its never a disadvantages to level up, but sometimes your strength don’t increase with 30% so your competing against yourself rather than other people. |
there's already a "all level" option in hunting records which covers everything...
BTW still have no idea why people are so crazy about hunt record... |
| Everyone likes to show off :) |
for tom22:
unless one can make as many hunting records as this guy:
https://www.lordswm.com/pl_info.php?id=4326215
otherwise no one would care about ur hunting records except yourself... |
there's already a "all level" option in hunting records which covers everything...
Maybe i did not make my self clear.
In all level people are competing against all.
For my idea you should compete against your level and all above your level since they have all the advantages on you.
I have done records I could not break in the level after. I had still killed more than everybody else in that level but did not get credited for it.
BTW still have no idea why people are so crazy about hunt record...
Can't see what that have to do about anything, and crazy is a bit of a strong expression in my opinon |
| -1 |
+1
Great idea, I've often wished for the same thing. |
for tom22:
unless one can make as many hunting records as this guy:
https://www.lordswm.com/pl_info.php?id=4326215
otherwise no one would care about ur hunting records except yourself...
Or for this guy:-
https://www.lordswm.com/pl_info.php?id=4332885 |
| +1 |
I think Khellendros means this:
On level 12 all factions we see this:
Khellendros [12] - 2831
Saant [12] - 2034
Surim [12] - 1738
On level 13 all factions we see this:
Surim [13] - 2937
DARYGEO [13] - 1992
Antos [13] - 1900
but it should be this:
Surim [13] - 2937
Khellendros [12] - 2831
DARYGEO [13] - 1992
+1 |
No doubt there's already an all-level function which covers this thing, but you can't expect a level 8 for example to be in the all-level list because you're competing with level 14s and 15s too.. On the other hand as what Robai elaborated, there is a chance that a level 12 might beat certain records by level 13.
So hunt records should be categorized and shown as 'Level X and below' and not plainly 'Level X'.
+1 |
Comments on this?>>
...
4. Any idea should have a purpose and describe the means of it's realization. It should also answer the question: "Why it needs to be done?".
...
-1 |
Yes this idea is good . I also wanted it.
+1
4. Any idea should have a purpose and describe the means of it's realization. It should also answer the question: "Why it needs to be done?".
It does. See Robai's illustration. |
Another example For knight hunt records on Sphynx Warriors
lvl 10
Khellendros 465
lvl 11
Darygeo 258
Lvl 12
Darygeo 402
This also gives the colour indication for hunt difficulties a weird perspective as you will see them as easier after you lvl up |
| +1 |
