Author | New ranking system |
The current ranking system is based on exp points. Its unfair. It only suggests that those who have started playing the game long time before have a huge advantage of being in the top. Players who have started today have almost no chance of being no.1 in the game's ranking system. I suggest a type of ranking system where the current playing of the player will be analized, no the experience points. In this way, even the new comers will have a chance. |
-1 They are more dedicated 2wards the game and have given their 4-5years of life to this game
+1 May be new players are capable of more hard work |
+1 for me because i will never get top
-1 for alyna who is top now |
In .ru there was a guy who reached lvl14 in 4 month. It is possible to become no 1 even if you start now.
plus whats the point?
-1 |
-1 it's better the way it is. |
for Makkadihm: everyone doesn't have the time and resources to do it. Those who have started before clearly have an advantage which should be atleast minimized.
for Mitashjain: If a person has started the game before, dosen't mean that he/she is more dedicated. It just means that he or she came to know about the game earlier than the new people. I have seen some lvl 14 or lvl 15 players, who are blocked but are still included in top 100!!! This should not be done. |
Those who have started before clearly have an advantage
Which is true in almost every online game there is...
4. Any idea should have a purpose and describe the means of it's realization. It should also answer the question: "Why it needs to be done?".
So, what is the purpose of this? Make a completely new raking system merely so that your name will appear on the top 100 list?
Suggestions like this have appeared before. The players who are currently on that list worked hard to get there. You want to get to the top by taking a shortcut? O.o
I agree with you that the blocked players should at the least be removed from the list, but if you want your name to appear there (no matter what your level is or when you started playing) then Earn the Right :)
If a person has started the game before, dosen't mean that he/she is more dedicated.
Completely agree with that. I started the game long before a few of the top 100 players. Yet, they're there and I'm here...and the reason I don't complain about that is because they played more, simple as that. They were more dedicated to the game than me. If you really want to be on the top 100, then do more battles and get more exp.
P.S. I apologise if this seems a bit of a personal attack on you. Your idea just reminded me of this other idea that was here long ago. This one guy wanted to reset the hunter records because he 'wanted to give new players a chance at making records' :/
If you want something, then work for it. Don't just try to change the system to have your way. |
Actually there ARE ranking systems that is not based on exp:
Hunting records, Survival tournament rankings etc. |
-1 Top players are a table for the players that got most exp points and works like intended. If you want other tables i am open for arguments |
I have seen some lvl 14 or lvl 15 players, who are blocked but are still included in top 100
Don't worry, they will eventually go. They cannot continue to earn exp so eventually there will not be any. |
-1
http://www.guildofheroes.ru/lords.php
You wanted to have the top 100 be based on something other than exp, then that already exists. You can rank players based upon their id, hg, tg, mg, cg, roulette, gpc, and more.
Your complaint that players who started playing earlier have an advantage is invalid. It's obvious in any game or real life activity those who started earlier should have an advantage. Someone who was just born yesterday obviously shouldn't be able to compete against a seasoned pro. But that doesn't mean the veterans can never be beaten by someone new. |
You can Rank players on a win/lose ratio. like at 100battles 80/100 at 500 340/500 something like that. |
-1.
There are many ways to measure success.
For instance that's what the achievements are for. Which you seem to have 0 of.
What's wrong with trying to be the best level 7? Are you? |