| Author | Robai's collection of suggestions |
|---|
|
| Great job there Robai! |
if you were the admin
the game would be #1 in the world :)
great ideas |
It's a shame you didn't catch it here:
https://www.lordswm.com/forum_messages.php?tid=1892187
I think that except promise of some feedback it also meant, that all other topics will not be viewed :-)
From me all +1, just number 8 -1. Too much advantage to buy. |
| *not a shame, but PITY. My English still not good :-) |
3) Change all data format to standard format yyyy-mm-dd:
i like dd-mm-yyyy
10) Please give us much bigger inventory (for diamonds or gold or whatever). It's impossible to have several sets now.
what about estates?
but yes i agree that inventory is too small
another werehouse on level 8 - 7 with diamonds would be great |
From me all +1, just number 8 -1. Too much advantage to buy.
What do you mean?
Potion of Roaming Infected Zombies
Effect: in the beginning of the next combat 5 stacks of 2 Infected Zombies are randomly placed and walks in random direction and attacks if they meet somebody on their way (even other zombie stack, your stack or enemy stack)
Price: 1 diamond
Where is the "too big advantage" in this potion?
It is mostly FUN part and indeed I would sometimes use such potion, just to have some fun on holidays.
Any potion can have the proper price.
If you think that some potion gives too big advantage then rise the price of that potion and the advantage will disappear. I.e. the question can be only in the price.
I mentioned only several potions (just for example, you can think of more examples yourself and suggest them).
I'm thinking about THOUSANDS of different potions so that a strategy player should think what is the best for him (I'm sure that really many players would waste much gold on them and there would be many not wise decisions - that is the idea, because it would give us more strategy in this game, I mean money part here). |
For me it's not question of proper price - I think attack +9 and double exp shouldn't be available to buy at all.
Mate, with your "anypotion logic", I can make +20attack +20 deffense potion and we can think of price. But still it shouldn't be even thought about to make such a potion ;-) What about "Double rally potion"(+2 +4 +6 to tiers) or "+1 dragon" potion? We must have some boundaries. |
We must have some boundaries.
Of course I agree with you. |
-1 @1(there shouldn't be only 3 users per IP). We must have some boundaries.
-1 @8("Gives us thousands types of consumables available for diamonds") Idea comes from Your post there. Heh, than even better give option to play on free server and make diamond server where You can buy all - even critical vulnerability where one hit kills or whatever just when you pay enough, but again -> We must have some boundaries.
-1 @10 it should be all about balance, you must calculate which set You want to use and not to stockpile things from ancient times, again abuse possible from extra money spenders... buy back there @06-02-08 08:48 1000 cape of fire protection and now resell as rare or whatever. This way You must choose what set do You want and besides 45 item in inventory is already enough, again -> We must have some boundaries.
In general +1 but hey, we really must have some boundaries :) and exploits of old times are gone for good so even with things as hunt assists or skill ratio stands that we must have some boundaries. I worked in several games as multihunter most notably on travian servers (more than one and more than few years) and my exp says that although You ll have 90% or even more like 99% of decent and polite players in start, there will always be several to find some way to exploit system no matter what You do and how much do You upgrade system, change rules, and they will corrupt that 99% so that ratio of potential cheats will be constantly raising if there is no sanction for exploiters. It really comes down as - we must have some boundaries in order to keep that few percent under some control. In other words, I see Your point in that reasonable suggestions, however I don't agree with that three in particular, because they might have potential exploit ;) |
for General_IB:
You mean -1 to everything ever suggested, because we must have some boundaries, right? :) |
| I think ... I agree with the double EXPS and Double SP .. :) |
| pretty gud ideas |
| nope, I mean like I wrote above - in general +1, meaning 7/10 70% for, 3/10 - 30% against :) |
