| Author | Prohibition of every economic activity for secondary chars |
|---|
Hello dear companions,
what did You think about the suggestion to prohibit every economical activity for secondary chars.
It's annoyed when few persons, each with 2-3 characters with well-developed LG buy elements and arts from factories and spoil the game for single-char players.
What I suggest is, that every economical operation should be done only from main character and the secondary characters should act like cortege and completely provisioned from main char but in one-way only:
its should be allowed to transfer gold, arts and elements to second-char from everyone main char,
but programmatic prohibited to transfer anything from second char, with only one exception = smith- and enchanter-services.
What is Your view on this suggestion? |
| i don'tlike it because it's like you having multi characters for example in world of warcraft but not being able to do quests with the others and you can do them only ewith main, but thn what is the sense of havinng a secondary character with lot's ofmoney when you actually cannot transfer and do not playit as often -1 |
for matomato12:
there is no word about prohibition for any quests, you still may play with it so much you want it: HG, MG, TG, CG and events. But No LG for second-char and main-char should provide artifacts for secondary.
Than we wouldn't have so much avaricious and invisible traders like now. |
| yes infact what i meant is like plaing a game but you can onlyplay 80% with it lg gives you bonuses that you can't have on your secondary characters if this rule is applaied (no dfence bonus) |
#3
Is it implement for you to do more illegal transfer? |
| i think that he wouldlike a rule like that to do illegal transfers XD |
for moro88:
i don't understand what is Your message, can You explain it more extensive?
for matomato12:
for Your suspicions here is another forum |
| nono i meant that youu would like that rule so that you could send things to your alts :P |
for matomato12:
for Your suspicions here is another forum |
wouldn't this contradict with the rule :
3.10. It is allowed to create additional characters to familiarize yourself with features of other factions. Additional character must be completely independent; remember, that multichars created for financial profiting of the main character in any way are blocked without hesitation. One player may have up to 3 characters (one main and two extras). |
| you do not understandwhat i am tring to say but ok for me it' -1 |
for sexy_girlz1989:
it's suggestion to change some rules and to bring clarity in game
for matomato12:
i understand you very well and repeat ones more for Your suspicions here is another forum
did you understand it? |
i understood but whati meant is that
its should be allowed to transfer gold, arts and elements to second-char from everyone main char,
is a thing that would help only you so it's a personal rule and it wouldn't help the community |
for matomato12:
ok, now it's clear, what about:
only main char may transfer arts to second chars
only for main chars is allowed to earn gold from LG
only main chars may trade on market or shopping facilities
every goods earned by second char in hunt, MG, event or whatever else is automatically transferred to main char
second char may only transfer arts with 0 durability to main char, without any exceptions and receive arts with durability more than 0 only from his main char without any exceptions
what do You think about these? |
| wellso there would have to be a change in rules and no alts but a supporting alt character ehich of you can have only one and acts as a piece of you |
if so,
what is the sense of having extra chars at all?
1. being not allowed to enrol, how do u earn gold to buy arts to meet AP?
2. being not allowed to buy or sell, how do u buy enhanced arts to play hard fights or tournaments?
3. why dont u suggest prohibiting any secondary chars at all? |
| he just want a free way to get his smith up.. hunt gold will be enough for hunt gold to cover the expense |
Madness.
If this is implemented, NO ONE will want to create a multi.
Why would anyone want to sacrifice precious gold from their main (plus with the new labourer's guild wage multiplier) to help their multi? Diamonds could be exchanged, more arts could be bought or enchanted...etc.
Plus multis lose their precious defense bonus.
only main char may transfer arts to second chars
Once again, see above.
only for main chars is allowed to earn gold from LG
Why not multi as well? You mean they can enroll to get the defense bonus, but no gold? Then what about the gold in the mine/factory? And what gets produced?
only main chars may trade on market or shopping facilities
And why? What about those extra arts? Oh wait...
every goods earned by second char in hunt, MG, event or whatever else is automatically transferred to main char
Then people will create multi, play till level 5 where all hunting arts are transferred, then quit that multi. After all, see 3rd paragraph.
second char may only transfer arts with 0 durability to main char, without any exceptions and receive arts with durability more than 0 only from his main char without any exceptions
And for what? So that you geta free way to get his smith up..
No way.
Big -1. |
I support ChooJeremy. It's kind of stoopid idea. If i want to have a very well developed secondary char with a different race than main what is the problem? In fact, additionally char is acting just like an another independent char. Why can add have gold to fight in HG, MG or CG (and NOT TG)?
Regarding market activity prohibition, again is wrong. What to do an add with MH or GH arts. If you think about it, for an add is more reliable to sell that art than to use 10 times and throw it out.
And it seems to me that you don’t know the main difference between an additional and a multi. An add has no interaction with main while multi is an account who do one way transfers (large) to main and he has no intention to reach high levels. |
for -P3nnyw1se-: thnx for Your statement
for elbuster:
for ChooJeremy:
for crys41:
the sense of second char is that in "relative nearly" future it will be technical possible to take second char in main-char battle. As saw on .ru in battles with dwarf-supporters.
The main advantage of my proposition is that there will be no add-char on market and estates, coz it should be technical impossible. Today it's prohibited for add-char to act on market but it still technical possible and since there is no transparency for other players hence there is no regular control for compliance with rule 3.13(1-7).
The main problem of add-char from my point of view, is that players with add-chars have very wide possibilities to act in economy compared with single-char players.
And by the way, why are You all so sure that I have any add-char? |
