| Author | Surrender |
|---|
The most reason for afk is the unequal distribution of power so in such a time when a player gets to know that he'll be losing he'll afk.. and some times a player may go afk since he might have accepted a challenge by mistake..
So i have come up with this idea if a player want to quit a battle he can declare his defeat and surrender..
But this may become a problem for players in a group battle so in group battle if a player surrender a request should be sent on either of his team mate wheather he'll continue or quit.. if he continue the troops of the surrendered player sould come under his control until the battle by this the player can remain superior in the battle... |
if he continue the troops of the surrendered player sould come under his control until the battle by this the player can remain superior in the battle stupid ... control 2 armies - knight and elf...
-1 |
i think its a good idea
1+
though the person should get no skill points just as if he afk |
-1
If one person afk's in a 3 vs 3 battle, how do you decide who controls that person's army? |
-1
people must not go afk
if they start a battle they must finish it |
| I always thought if a person goes afk the artificial intelligence should take over and play the troops. This would solve much of the GB frustration when someone goes afk. |
-1
Controlling 2 armies is just insane.
I'd rather AI just take over.
At least it's something, rather than an afk partner. |
| +1 I think in this way battles will always be equal |
-1
that's the matter of sportsmanship. is that mean you can surrender when you think you going to lose the fight? |
