| Author | Tournament cheat left Unbanned |
|---|
This is a short and to the point post for the mods/admins:
Scratchy, the winner of our tournament, is also a cheat.
https://www.lordswm.com/pl_transfers.php?id=4396943 This is his transfer log.
itchy, a secondary account used for giving money to scratchy, has been helping him for a long time through illegal transfers by the means of artifact renting. He pays way too much and doesn't use the durability
Even just the names make it obvious. Please, do the just thing and block his account as well. He does not deserve the 200k he won from empire.
In case anybody needs more, i will post a more detailed message very soon. |
It has come to my attention that uthaibang, one of the tournament winners, has been banned. However, one of the other winners, the player Scratchy, was left unpunished. If you look through his transfer logs, you will see that for a very long amount of time, he ahs been feeding his main account scratchy in through a financial web in which he leases out artifacts for 150 gold per battle and returns them without using any battles.
This, I know, is a form of financial assistance. Secondary accounts aren't even allowed to be in the services of artifact renting. His excuse- itchy is a friend and does his repairing. Everybody, look closely at his tranfer logs and tell me, is anybody repairing those artifacts? no. Definately not.
On occasion, itchy does use one battle. My guess is to clear his workaholic penalty, however every time this occasion comes up it just so happens that he payed for two battles. Look at the names of these characters, it is severely obvious that they are cheats and should both be blocked.
Please, create justice in Lordswm. Don't let a cheat win a tournament and then flaunt the money that really should have gone to those people who ended with only 11 wins who actually deserve it.
Lastly, on both of their character pages they say that they sometimes play at scratchy's house from the same IP. To me, it is obvious this is just a cover up, to try to prevent people from suspicion if they saw they had the same IP. If they were truly friends itchy would have simply sent over a loan or gift to scratchy, not taken the time to rent and return the artifacts.
Scratchy's character ID: https://www.lordswm.com/pl_info.php?id=4396943
Itchy's character ID: https://www.lordswm.com/pl_info.php?id=4397127
Scratchy's transfer log (i reccomend searching his log as itchy's is filled with other people who actually did want their arts repaired, unless u have a filter): https://www.lordswm.com/pl_transfers.php?id=4396943 |
[Post deleted by moderator EROCS // No 3rd party comments]
[Player banned by moderator EROCS until 2010-05-12 23:40:00 // No expressing personal opinions in CaA local rule 1.] |
Itchy is my friend, we know eachother and we created our chars at same time beouce we love groupbattle and wanted to create nice team names. Admin can check our ip but they wont find something becouse we are two different ppl.
We are both diamond players and buy from different visa card. You can also look that up.Do you really belive that one player invest arround 200 Diamonds in two different charakters buying all upgrades with diamonds ?? just to rent out items We play together and you can ask ppl or watch some combats so you will see that we both talk different things. Renting out Items has nothing to do with cheat.
I got cheated becouse i lost a tgi bought with 80 diamonds and admin block those player.. In Germany this is called cyber criminal but i accepted the hard thing without getting compensation.
Funny thing you are talking about |
| [Post deleted by moderator Erebes // ] |
| [Post deleted by moderator Erebes // ] |
| The point wasn't that you were renting arts it was that you were returning them unused. |
| [Post deleted by moderator Erebes // ] |
| [Post deleted by moderator Erebes // ] |
| [Post deleted by moderator Erebes // ] |
[Post deleted by moderator Erebes // Off topic .]
[Player banned by moderator Erebes until 2010-05-12 14:07:36 // The complaint is not about how many diamonds you bought or how you lost your tgi . Off topic . Warning .] |
| [Post deleted by moderator Queen_Amanda // No 3rd party comments] |
[Post deleted by moderator Erebes // ]
[Player banned by moderator Erebes until 2010-05-12 20:35:17 // No 3rd party comments] |
1. If you aren't related to the application directly - don't leave your messages in it's topic. Third-party comments are allowed only for providing additional facts about the affair, or for replacing the link to warlog with the more readable battlechat. Discussions, expressing personal opinions, etc. are penalized with at least 24 hour ban.
Dont bann all ppl telling new things |
for Scratchy:
Those people provided no new evidence . They were expressing opinions on why they thought you were not a cheater . |
Surprisingly, some of this may be relevant. I have no direct experience with buying tgi's with diamonds, but here is a pm from an anonomous person i recently recieved:
Scratchy said: I got cheated becouse i lost a tgi bought with 80 diamonds and admin block those player.
He is lying here: when you enter the thief guild with diamonds, you don't actually receive a thief invitation, you are automatically included in the guild. So he never received an thief invitation from paying with diamonds! How could he loose something (the tgi) that he never had?...
------------------------------------------------------------------
So basically either losing the TGI is a lie or the player scratchy is also involved in thief guild assisting, assuming this players sources are correct. Perhaps this is why he was so intent on explaining why his TGI wasn't returned as well. |
He is right, you do not receive any TGI when you pay 80 diamonds, but rather joining the TG directly. But you do receive a TGI when you reach TG 2 (in the past, which Scratchy did).
Copy from his log (deleted before):
01-25-09 09:30: Transferred item(s): 'Thief invitation' [1/1] to Doctor_Etk . Transaction price: 1 Gold
01-25-09 09:24: Transferred 1 Gold to Doctor_Etk : 2 k each day after 14 days .max 1 month total
01-25-09 09:23: Transferred 1 Gold to Doctor_Etk : return2 thief art and invite when reach tg lvl2
01-25-09 09:23: Transferred 1 Gold to Doctor_Etk : return1 thief art when reach tg lvl1
(Should be relevant to the complaint now since accusation in #16 made) |
Topic starter's main concern is in these transfers:
05-04-10 19:07: itchy has returned an item: "Cape of arcane protection [F2]" [10/50]
05-04-10 19:07: itchy has returned an item: "Light mithril boots" [18/55]
05-04-10 19:07: itchy has returned an item: "Dragon shield [A2]" [14/70]
05-04-10 19:07: itchy has returned an item: "Sword of might [E2]" [37/73]
05-04-10 19:07: itchy has returned an item: "Light mithril coif [F2]" [45/70]
05-04-10 19:07: itchy has returned an item: "Light mithril cuirass [E3]" [41/70]
05-04-10 05:31: Transferred item(s): 'Cape of arcane protection [F2]' [10/50] to be returned until 05-05-10 05:31 ; for 1 battles to itchy . Transaction price: 150 Gold
05-04-10 05:31: Transferred item(s): 'Mithril longsword' [41/70] to be returned until 05-05-10 05:31 ; for 1 battles to itchy . Transaction price: 150 Gold
05-04-10 05:31: Transferred item(s): 'Light mithril boots' [18/55] to be returned until 05-05-10 05:31 ; for 1 battles to itchy . Transaction price: 150 Gold
05-04-10 05:31: Transferred item(s): 'Dragon shield [A2]' [14/70] to be returned until 05-05-10 05:31 ; for 1 battles to itchy . Transaction price: 150 Gold
05-04-10 05:31: Transferred item(s): 'Light mithril cuirass [E3]' [41/70] to be returned until 05-05-10 05:31 ; for 1 battles to itchy . Transaction price: 150 Gold
05-04-10 05:31: Transferred item(s): 'Light mithril coif [F2]' [45/70] to be returned until 05-05-10 05:31 ; for 1 battles to itchy . Transaction price: 150 Gold
Rent for 1 battle but arts were unused when returned.
04-29-10 19:04: itchy has returned an item: "Light mithril boots" [18/55]
04-29-10 19:04: itchy has returned an item: "Cape of arcane protection [F2]" [10/50]
04-29-10 19:04: itchy has returned an item: "Light mithril cuirass [E3]" [41/70]
04-29-10 19:03: itchy has returned an item: "Light mithril coif [F2]" [45/70]
04-27-10 16:59: Transferred item(s): 'Cape of arcane protection [F2]' [11/50] to be returned until 29-04-10 16:59 ; for 2 battles to itchy . Transaction price: 300 Gold
04-27-10 16:59: Transferred item(s): 'Light mithril coif [F2]' [46/70] to be returned until 29-04-10 16:59 ; for 2 battles to itchy . Transaction price: 300 Gold
04-27-10 16:59: Transferred item(s): 'Light mithril boots' [19/55] to be returned until 29-04-10 16:59 ; for 2 battles to itchy . Transaction price: 300 Gold
04-27-10 16:59: Transferred item(s): 'Light mithril cuirass [E3]' [42/70] to be returned until 29-04-10 16:59 ; for 2 battles to itchy . Transaction price: 300 Gold
Rent for 2 battles, arts were used only once.
There were numerous of such sets of transfers, from page 1 to 4. |
Post for the admins:
Please look at this forum post regarding the first mixed tournament winner "Scratchy" it is in english but just in case i will translate the main complaint into russian
Throughout the first four pages of his transfer log the player "Scratchy" has sent artifacts over to his alternate account "Itchy" for a large amount of gold. Itchy does not use the artifacts but rather returns them, or pays for two battles and only uses one. Please look through his transfer logs and find a suitable punishment for his transfers. |
| [Post deleted by moderator Pang // no 3rd party comments in CaA] |
