| Author | Mistery |
|---|
How is it possible ????
liv 2
gold 1,296,455
wood 1393
ore 1319
mercury 106
0
0
gems 640
+3
+3
0
+2
0
+1
0%
» Combat level: 2 (4462) +38
» Troops ready: 100%
» Mana: 20 / 20
» Location: Great Capital
O_o |
| Laborers' guild: 6 (3864) |
he only work and not fight ????
I dont know is it sim city .....
O_o |
| yes many players do it |
also some players lose on purpose in hunts because they get better faction skill to exp ratios.
so they play for a long time but are only very low level :) |
this one is more strange:
Roulette bets total: 0
Roulette winnings total: 0
Combats fought: 1 Games played: 0
Victories: 1 Victories: 0
Defeats: 0 Defeats: 0
Gold 580,852,940
Wood 606313
Ore 393791
Mercury 2348982
Sulfur 767122
Crystals 344598
Gems 989792
:)) |
for SpecialOne:
No picking on Empire, our beloved Liege please. |
Frank say :
also some players lose on purpose in hunts because they get better faction skill to exp ratios.
I dont understand because thay get better faction skill
if they loose ....... |
I dont understand because thay get better faction skill
if they loose...
They just want to get the maximum faction skill level for the lowest possible combat level.
If you lose every time, you can eventually achieve this result, but it's incredibly slow and boring. This approach reached its limits when rules were modified months ago to link faction skill points to victory or defeat. Before, you could earn up to 0.5 faction skill point when losing a PvM game, now it's 0.2 at best.
Frankly, you'd better off play the game as expected rather than waste your time this way. |
https://www.lordswm.com/warlog.php?warid=480820607
MTI gets 0.5 skill points anyway |
one time I take 0.06
https://www.lordswm.com/warlog.php?warid=480832396 |
I dont understand because thay get better faction skill
if they loose .......
In the past the rules were different and you got 0.49 skill point and 0 experience for losing a hunt. |
ok , thanks to all
:) |
My only hope is that those players get fined, banned, kicked, or something because it is purely exploitative in nature.
Cheers,
LS |
for limustudotcom:
for losing in hunts on purpose? |
for limustudotcom:
The experience for losing has been changed and this loophole has been closed. It doesn't matter now. |
| closed by Shebali (2009-07-10 21:28:15) |
|---|
