| Author | game rule against the clans... |
|---|
Rule 1.5.1: The Administration has a right to cease access to the service for users whose in-game behavior is a dedicated assist to another character or group of characters.
Hmm... is it me or the clan leaders/recruiters/treasurers are not allowed to do anything because of this rule? So, what's the point in having a clan if you are not allowed to work for it?
Let me explain for those who are not clan leaders: once you are a clan leader you have to work for the clan to make it stronger, so, any clan leader has an in-game behavior which is a dedicated assist to another character or group of characters (named clan here). The same for recruiters and treasurers and any position from a clan as they are working for the clan.
I suppose this rule is a little bit ambiguous and it needs additional explanations, don't you think?
(now, dilema: is it general game related or game suggestion?) |
| I believe it means spending most of your gold for someone else`s profit. I might be wrong. |
It's absolutely true!
If you apply this rule literally, you have to "cease access" to every clan related character. If the spirit of this rule can be understanded, the way it is written makes it sounds ambiguous. |
| *understood |
The Administration has a right to cease access to the service
not
The Administration will cease access to the service
it makes sense. they will decide if they'll block you depending on whether you are here to play the game or for someone else's benefit, and therefore..
If you apply this rule literally, you have to "cease access"
you don't have to :)
and it never happens anyway |
#5:
Hopefully! :) Still, according to that rule, they can cease access to whoever they want. |
Hopefully! :) Still, according to that rule, they can cease access to whoever they want.
No you are not right. They can cease access to any person according to this rule, it is more clear and it states they can do anything:
1.5. The Administration has a right to stop offering the service to any particular user, subnetwork, or in global. |
#7:
Yeap, but violating a rule is not the same with their will. All the clans are violating the rule 1.5.1 (excepting the dead clans) in this shape. So, let's block all the players belonging to one clan et least! :D |
| Both these rules say (1.5.1 is a subsection of rule 1.5. I think) they have RIGHT to. The administration doesnt have obligation to cease access to service to all people who help each other I think. It just states when you do nothing except financial support, then you dont have to be multi to be penalised. |
Hmm... is it me or the clan leaders/recruiters/treasurers are not allowed to do anything because of this rule?
This has nothing to do against clans. No worry CGSMCMLXXV, if Administration wanted to target clans, they would have named them. |
| closed by Lord Kotrin (2009-06-25 22:34:50) |
|---|
