Forums-->General game forum-->
1|2
| Author | OH the cowards in the game |
|---|
All but too often you see cowards appear in battles
14-35: demonwrath[4], lordsumant[5], calibra[5] vs steppenwolfx[4], R_HAUER[10], dumb_machine[9]
thats an example, i had created a battle when this was up, this was an optional battle and the first team had its 3 players, a level 4 and 2 level 5s and the second team had its lone level 4
so being the brave warriors they are the level 10 and 9 joined
why???? the exp and fsp gains wouldnt be worth the arts durability wasted
they would have discouraged the lower levels from even wanting to play
But this happens all too often
all the time you see battles set up like 2 vs 1 3-4 vs 4-4
Is the the victory that important?
shouldn't the fun and challenge of the battle be as important?
i know not everyone does this, i know its really just handful, but you do it see it alot
i didnt write this to start an arguement, just to let off some steam so please dont spam and flame this | then why are battles created where such high levels can join????
i guess everybody hoped they would be on their side, right? | hmmm just realised i wasn't answering to your question... you ment why the high levels join such battles where the profit is almost nothing...
well, sometimes you just want a fast and hard and easy battle, show off to low levels and to win without effort. no sarcasm here, sometimes you just need that... | Maybe they are looking for fun...or somehow they want to "teach a lesson" to the battle creator (who makes 4-10 vs 4-10 battle)
If you don't like this situation, my advice is : never create or join such battle | | banned plz him | ban who ?
Those who join ?
-Nop they had the right to join the fight, the creator made the mistake of
setting up 4-10
The creator fo the thread ?
-Nop why would you ban someone from expressing his own opinion about wrong
battle set up ? | | Abby if you want a battle with higher levels(for some reason) make it random, at least they have a chance to be teamed fair and no one can complain because no one is teaming with the higher levels or something like that. | Omega22, have you check Abby's profile before saying such ?
Abby (Level 10)
What she said is, that she saw a lot of those kinda game and she feels like level 10 people should join in such a game when one side is complete with all level 4-5 members and the other side is free.
What I think she was trying to say is : Use your judgement before screwing up a fair match up. | | She's saying she already had a random fight up, and a different fight, that she WASN'T IN already had the first team of 4-5-5, with just a 4 on the second team, so why did the 9 and 10 join the fight to make it 4-5-5 vs 4-9-10 instead of joining the random battle which she already had setup, there was a choice between a nice fair game that would be fun, by joining her battle, but instead the 2 people went for the cowards way out and joined the most one sided battle they could, to guarantee that they would win | | lcorndogl +1 | She's saying she already had a random fight up, and a different fight, that she WASN'T IN already had the first team of 4-5-5, with just a 4 on the second team, so why did the 9 and 10 join the fight to make it 4-5-5 vs 4-9-10 instead of joining the random battle which she already had setup, there was a choice between a nice fair game that would be fun, by joining her battle, but instead the 2 people went for the cowards way out and joined the most one sided battle they could, to guarantee that they would win
exactly thank you | for lcorndogl & Abby:
It is hard to know whether that one was set up as a random or not. If the two guys were in for a random battle and one on each side, it might be a fun battle. No need to be harsh on them, especially when they might not see this at all. :)
I myself would not join this kind of 4-13 vs 4-13 battle; a 10-13 one, maybe.. :D | | Misunderstood then, sleep deprivation. Dont play lordswm more than 20 hours in a row. Not healthy really. | may i say that there could be a fair reason for this behaviour?
I myself once joined a battle where there were levels 3 and 4 and i was a 7.. but i had just changed faction, and my troops were far (very far, thanks roulette ^^") from complete (i had tier 1, 2 and 3, nothing else, and a faction skill 0).
In this situation, the player's level is just a number, and obviously one can't join a battle with people from same level, he would be killed from scratch.
So, even if this is not always the situation, let me say that, sometime, it is (in my opinion) an useful thing to have multi-level battles, although they will look unbalanced :) | telca,
In that situation, you had the benefit of higher attributes, talent points and more troops. You had a decided advantage over your opponents (even taking into account your 0 faction level).
I'm not saying what you did was morally wrong, I'm just pointing out that a level 7 character with lower tier troops and no faction skill is stronger than a level 3 or 4 character. | | I think, the high level player that joined that battle were very smart, they know when and how to get free EXPS and SP .. but the players that created that battle I think, know the risk they will get when high level players fight against them .. as long as the battles not CONTRACTUAL battle, that is fine, I think .. :) enjoy .. ^^ | for lcorndogl & Abby:
It is hard to know whether that one was set up as a random or not. If the two guys were in for a random battle and one on each side, it might be a fun battle. No need to be harsh on them, especially when they might not see this at all. :)
I myself would not join this kind of 4-13 vs 4-13 battle; a 10-13 one, maybe.. :D
she was waiting for people to join her random battle, and could see that the other battle was optional, not a random one
may i say that there could be a fair reason for this behaviour?
I myself once joined a battle where there were levels 3 and 4 and i was a 7.. but i had just changed faction, and my troops were far (very far, thanks roulette ^^") from complete (i had tier 1, 2 and 3, nothing else, and a faction skill 0).
In this situation, the player's level is just a number, and obviously one can't join a battle with people from same level, he would be killed from scratch.
So, even if this is not always the situation, let me say that, sometime, it is (in my opinion) an useful thing to have multi-level battles, although they will look unbalanced :)
https://www.lordswm.com/pl_info.php?id=4321324
Full troops + mini arts, this reason is definately not valid | #1
why didnt you just create a fight for levels from 4 to 5 ?
its your fault , you created the game with those rules | for Nebiros92:
Are you dumb or something.
Abby is level 10...she had created a game level 8-10. And a level 9 and 10 decided to join:
demonwrath[4], lordsumant[5], calibra[5] vs steppenwolfx[4], R_HAUER[10], dumb_machine[9]
instead of game where they actually get a challenege and exp/fsp. | think, the high level player that joined that battle were very smart, they know when and how to get free EXPS and SP .. but the players that created that battle I think, know the risk they will get when high level players fight against them .. as long as the battles not CONTRACTUAL battle, that is fine, I think .. :) enjoy .. ^^
lol, smart or coward?
EXP? about 300exp and 0.3fsp for 20 minutes game |
This topic is long since last update and considered obsolete for further discussions.
1|2Back to topics list
|
