| Author | Flooders Tenthouse |
|---|
| POLPOPLOPOLPOLPOLOPLPOLPOLPLopolplplpolpolplplplopolpo |
| Post message |
| I am waiting miles, i am waiting for your response. |
| wow this thread is still alive :o |
Sorry for my tardiness Igles, chalk it up to a general fear of the direct challenge...
So rules and guidelines you say,
I think in for fairness and randomness, someone other than us puts down a word, we have to each say what it means. Rinse and repeat. The person who put the word down decides which is the "correct" definition.
I spent a few minutes trying to find when we spontaneously did that, but to no avail, as anyone reading this without that context would see this for sure as super dull. A link would exemplify this a touch.
I guess rather than a head to head, I would think it only fair that anyone could join in, should anyone do so.
Thoughts? |
| I mostly agree with the ruleset but want to add a rebuttal clause, after the first round of definitions each player gets to double down or pivot before the winner is decided. We will set the game to 5 words total. We will allow other participants to join and we will have one day per word. This thread will be the place where we will accept participation request. I will ask my good friend Danathan to preside as the moderator for the contest. The words will be decided by Danathan from all the suggestions posted here. We still need to decide stakes. I am open to suggestions on the stakes. |
Personally I prefer Filet Steak with a nice creamy mushroom sauce.
Situationally wooden ones have proven to be more effective
While a financial incentive is perhaps traditional, it is also dull.
I suggest that one wins bragging rights, and the loser gets a forfeit. Something along the lines of a humiliating activity. |
| Just the way i like it, we will take a page out of merlin’s book and post a declaration of defeat and crown the winner the greatest etymologist of all time. |
| Agreed then, I await the battle of words. |
| The |
