| Author | Attack Survilurgov ( Battles for area ) |
|---|
for Lord Khellendros:
What i'm saying is :
You cant play less than another person and yet be more competive than him,he will be much better than you in all terms mainly fsp.in other words you cant have something if you are not willing to do what it takes to get to it.if you want something you have to work for it.and forget about the come where you played less and (maybe?) was still competive,that changed the moment we merged with ru Not after the survilurgs came.
also if you prefer skill(and you have it) then you shouldn't worry about some 1/1/1 stat from clan.
you want to be semi active,be competive,have clan bonus and be in a friend clan....sorry cant have it all |
You cant play less than another person and yet be more competive than him,he will be much better than you in all terms mainly fsp.in other words you cant have something if you are not willing to do what
You seem to be confused.
Ofc people that have invested less should not get same heroes. But before you could chose your own speed an intensity.
If you played less hours a day you could still be as competitive as one who played a lot as long they maintained their guild ratio. So it was just a time factor that made the difference
For example.
If I played 2 hours a day I could have same terms as a guy who played 4 hours a day as long as we did the same mix of battles. He would just experience the game in twice the speed. That was the beauty of this game, one of the reason MANY liked it
if you prefer skill(and you have it) then you shouldn't worry about some 1/1/1 stat from clan.
So you are saying if I want a skill game I should not care that it is uneven?
That make no sense. If I raced you and you had to carry 50 kg on your back would we see who was best? No I would have an advantages and we would have a predictable unfair race.
you want to be semi active,be competive,have clan bonus and be in a friend clan....sorry cant have it all
I could before the clan buildings was introduced :o) |
I could before the clan buildings was introduced :o)
this reminds me the dilemnia of myself at last year of .com. was a fresh lvl 15, if decide to join CG, had to face all the best players of server. Beside their superior playing experience, most have 1-2 more faction level, at least 1 more HG than me etc.etc. At those days, there were no solution to balance (since CG system itself was designed to kill GB clans that specialised on balancing/cheap fighting). glad I havent quit totaly because of my frustruation.
If you still want to play CG but hesitant because of 3 points that your MC cant provide.. well, you have options like play within you clan.
of course, you will be handicapped in tourneys, events .. anything open to whole server. that is the cost of your MC choice.
I seriously believe, in most cases, your CG experience and playing skill will compensate that "tiny" handicap. |
like play within you clan.
A misconception that you can chose your adversary by setting clan restriction. You can't. That only filters who joins you. Your team can be a clan-mates team. |
for Warlock naviron:
thx for correction. I had no idea :(. that adds to my hate versus CG's structure. looks like admins full effort is to make this game un-enjoyable for PvP fans. |
I seriously believe, in most cases, your CG experience and playing skill will compensate that "tiny" handicap.
Others also have CG experience and combats can be close. +1 attack/defence/ini is not a tiny handicap it is significant. I would not want to go without in a PvP tourny
this reminds me the dilemnia of myself at last year of .com. was a fresh lvl 15, if decide to join CG, had to face all the best players of server. Beside their superior playing experience, most have 1-2 more faction level, at least 1 more HG than me etc.etc. At those days, there were no solution to balance (since CG system itself was designed to kill GB clans that specialised on balancing/cheap fighting). glad I havent quit totaly because of my frustruation.
Level 15 was broken, we solved the CG problem in most cases by arranging teams before hand. Ofc it should nver have been our job but we did it and was rewarded with many great battles |
There are some facilities whose defense is not attributed to any MC (e.g., https://www.lordswm.com/object-info.php?id=175, https://www.lordswm.com/object-info.php?id=298, etc...).
Will they be up for competition to take control of them again? |
Finally i seen and elf vs 3 AI in facility defend
https://www.lordswm.com/war.php?lt=-1&warid=569611895
nice battle :) |
| [Post deleted by moderator Pang // ] |
| [Post deleted by moderator Pang // ] |
| [Post deleted by moderator Pang // by requested] |
| up defenders |
| What i can't understand is why suddenly (without any game change - since double insight tourney came) survilurgs attacks increased to 1+ def/day/facility. |
| no event or major tourney = 2 def/day/facility? |
| Ok, after Halloween we had: 1 def/day/facility on 1,2 and 3 November, but on 4th surprise: survilurgs start attacking with more than 1 def/day/facility, obviously! Why, no difference between 3 and 4. If at the beginning of a new week this kind of things can happen, at least is good to know. |
| on weekend def is reduced to 1/mine(saturday,sunday) |
@crys41
The admins know most of the hard core players are students so they turn the rate of attacks down at the weekend when they are drinking and less likely to play. Then during the week when they have lectures the rate goes up again.
This can be expressed by the equation:
drinking > Survilurg defences > lectures
Of course that does disadvantage working players but I suspect they are a minority
(I am being facetious, for those who didn't spot that immediately ;) ) |
| dont u think surviguls are this week stronger? |
| post barb event they are strong most of the time. |
dont u think surviguls are this week stronger?
indeed. unfortunately I think these battles will become unprofitable |
