| Author | Roulette Formula broken by me ! |
|---|
| probably so I'm working to break more formula now :) |
This roulette isn't random, it's managed by admins, roulette numbers follows their mynd
Terengganu as always, not a bit of common sense, anything to prove your statement? Because when you accuse someone of cheating in the big scale you should have a bit of a proof. You could probably find more proofs of Xenu thetans than the admins rigging the roulette. (No offence to scientology or any other religion)
PS: Mynd? What does it mean? Mynd..
Update of our noble roullete code breaker:
Roulette bets total: 66,279
Roulette winnings total: 62,042 |
Update of our noble roullete code breaker:
Roulette bets total: 66,279
Roulette winnings total: 62,042
lol :) that's very funny hahahha |
| mynd,maybe he or she wanted to type mind but finger to big pressed the wrong button |
Everyone just go now to spin history and see about my formula with 23 ''Golden Number'' and start counting after 23 untill 00 and see how it's 7 counts and the number after 00 is 7 that's proves my formula :) any other complainments ?
Would you mind to stop using words like 'proof' and 'math' till you familiarized yourself with their meanings? A single observation proves that your formula may apply in some cases (which is what anyone who has the slightest sense for statistics could have told you) but it doesn't show that it happens with a probability greater than in a completely random roulette. Following your reasoning I could prove that roulette always lands on 27 just by saying, everyone look at the spin history now it rolled 27.
This roulette isn't random, it's managed by admins, roulette numbers follows their mynd
The human mind is unable to design random sequences, you couldn't even make up a sequence of 0 and 1 of length 100 that looks random to even the most trivial tests, let alone using 38 different numbers. |
mynd,
huh? I typed mynd but lazy to fix, i mean it's the same speach and how to say |
Would you mind to stop using words like 'proof' and 'math' till you familiarized yourself with their meanings? A single observation proves that your formula may apply in some cases (which is what anyone who has the slightest sense for statistics could have told you) but it doesn't show that it happens with a probability greater than in a completely random roulette. Following your reasoning I could prove that roulette always lands on 27 just by saying, everyone look at the spin history now it rolled 27.
First of all that's not what I meant ! I meant check the spin and see that after 7 counts after 23 untill 00 is 7 counts then bet on everything related to 7 such as ,27,7,17 and because 27 already showed just don't stake much gold on it and make all yr stakes on 7 and 17 after 00or 0 and the number was 7 which proves my formula !
my formula doesn't way alwayse bet on 7 .no just bet on the number you have counted before 29 counts otherwise the 23 AFFECT goes away.
read my formula again before you post something about it ! |
| I read your formula I just don't believe it works. What I was trying to say is when you use a single event as a prove you can prove anything and I tried to show this to you by proving something that is obviously wrong (roulette doesn't always roll 27). If you really want to prove something you need hundreds of observations to get a reliable result, so why don't you take some of the archives from the past month and check whether your method outperforms expectation there or at least make some cash with your formula. |
Roulette bets total: 73,847
Roulette winnings total: 67,042
Update |
read your formula I just don't believe it works. What I was trying to say is when you use a single event as a prove you can prove anything and I tried to show this to you by proving something that is obviously wrong (roulette doesn't always roll 27). If you really want to prove something you need hundreds of observations to get a reliable result, so why don't you take some of the archives from the past month and check whether your method outperforms expectation there or at least make some cash with your formula
well that's excatly what I did and hundereds of times it worked !
As I said more than %80 times it works anyway if u don't want to try then just don't try it .
Roulette bets total: 73,847
Roulette winnings total: 67,042
you know that I need alot of gold to begin with so I can prove my formula and if you want to see it just loan me 100k ?
Update |
you know that I need alot of gold to begin with so I can prove my formula and if you want to see it just loan me 100k ?
i have a brilliant 'formula' which needs 100k to prove.
serial bets on 0,00
the assumptions are:
1: 0,00 will land atleast once every 12 hours
2: the player must serially bet every spin without fail
3: bet at a stretch of 9 hours
4: it doesn't guarantee a win but the profit can be anywhere from 0 to 25.6k
if 0,00 hasn't appeared in the last 3 hours, start betting serially every spin on 0,00
start with 200 per bet.
after 18 bets double bet to 400
hence forth keep doubling every 9 bets (bet amount will be 3.2k per bet then)
if assumption 1 is favoured by roul randomness you win/not lose anything
or else at the end of 9 hours you will be at a loss of 57.6k
if you are still feeling optimistic go on to 6.4k and 12.8k (lv13 players only) for another 9+9 bets!
my point is, _if_ the formula actually works 80% of the times, you can prove it with less than 100k, afterall straight up bets have good rewards. |
well that's excatly what I did and hundereds of times it worked !
Well now I did some calculation myself (I modified your formula a bit to make calculation easier, but I play every number you play, just some more, so the effect is negligible if it exists at all) and that's what I found:
July, August, November 2008:
July:
The formula made 370 bets and won 6, that means you lose 154 times the amount you bet.
August:
The formula made 526 bets and won 14 (which is slightly more than the expectation of 13.84), but you still lose 22 times the amount you bet.
November:
455 bets and 8 wins, loss 167 times your bet.
And now the interesting part:
December 2008, January 2009
December:
496 bets, 15 wins (expectation 13.05), win 44 times your bet (it was at 103 at top)
January:
412 bets, 12 wins (expectation 10.84), win 20 times your bet (it was at 132 at top)
So does that mean your formula works? Of course it doesn't, when you deal with such small ratios (6 - 15 over 350 - 500) you are bound to get some variance and that December and January outperformed expectation (a little) indicates to me that you used these two archives to find your formula in the first place. |
that after 7 counts after 23 untill 00 is 7 counts then bet on everything related to 7 such as ,27,7,17
Where does this all come from? Pure observation or what? I have adviced you to do some testing on that. It is the first rule of scientific method - Always think about your theory as if it was wrong, and try to find out as many reasons and proofs it is not. Thats what Einstein, Schrodinger and other nerds were doing their whole life, composed a theory, checked every aspect of it, expected to be wrong and found out why it isnt. |
Some roulette formula Broken by me!
New one broken by me too !
When you see 17 bet on 28 untill 20 spins maximum ,and you can do it oppositely too so 28 then bet 17 ,
Most of the times you will win from the first time so it will be like this!
17
28
Or like this
2
17
4
28
But some times until 13 spin exactly you shall win but some times less or a little bit more !
Anyway remember to stop betting if lost more than 20 times because maybe another number took over 28 which can be 26 and with 17 maybe 16 took over it so it doesn’t show up .
Still more formulas yet to come :)
You can check my formula on past months and see that it works 80 to 90%. |
Roulette bets total: 80,793
Roulette winnings total: 70,999
I give up. Remember that gauss statistics thing? You have lost 12% of the gold you bet. Statistically you should be losing only 5.2%. You are below average..so much for the magic formula. |
you loan me 100k and I'll prove it to you !
and don't worry I won't loose and even if I loose I will not leave the game because I'm a serious gamer and will stay and pay it back :0
If don't to no offence :) |
WarlordFChaos quote:
you loan me 100k and I'll prove it to you !
MyDoom quote:
He will sell his arts to play roulette soon believe me. :)
Omega22 answer: Level up, do some merc quests, send me 35-36 meteorite shards and I will send you 100k for them. I would rather believe Albert Einstein than you, no offense. |
I admire Albert Einstein ,and his work !
plus the fact he had a problem speaking untill the age of 9 !
I will level up I believe you too and MyDoom because I need lots of gold to begin with and I can get that by leveling up so thanks for the tip Omega22 :) |
no It's not right then is it, if it was the correct formula then it would work 100% of the time
Lock
nothing works a %100 time ! because players would have become milloiners.
!
a proper formula would work 100% of the time, not just 80%, therefore your formula has flaws in it and isn't "the one" formula that has cracked roulette |
| there is obviously a 100% way, though to do it takes alot of time and gold. |
