| Author | Roulette Mathematics |
|---|
Have these patterns been able to make consistent profits?
Yes. You will observe players who bet only straight ups generally are in good profits.
This (Mirror pattern) also works for 0 and 00. There is a player who only bets on 0 or 00 and is in ~7mil+ profit.
To add to #40, think it of as a loop. The loop of mirror cannot run infinitely so it has to stop somewhere. It is again on your luck whether at your time of betting the loop is running (which will result in a win) or has it stopped (which will lead to loss).
To check for the loop, generally it is a good idea to analyze Roulette history for that day.
This game's roulette is biased meaning some numbers have a higher probability of appearing than others. There was a site which analysed all the 38 numbers and calculated their probabilities from beginning of time till now. I forgot that site but clearly you could see the roulette is biased. |
for MarineBiologist:
If only we .commers could get past "Roulette is evil/Roulette drains gold/Roulette is not good for your char" comments on every roulette thread. :)
Well, tbh, I don't think I ever really seen any concrete discussion on roulette's RNG pattern. The discussions that have happened in the past seems more only about estimating probability and the strats of 'choosing a certain number/pattern because it haven't appeared in a long time'.
I guess if we wan't to look for patterns in the RNG, we have to analyse thousands of numbers from hundreds of days worth of data, for it to be a credible proof of the pattern. Is this what they have been doing? Have this been done before on .com community? |
~30 iirc to complete 13-31 pair.
what is the average number of spins to complete 13-31 pair? if it's more than 20 then this "pair" is not real
and There are many patterns.
, could you list some so we can verify? If those patterns are true, then you don't need a lot of them to become rich! Just 1 bet can give you hundreds of thousands of gold |
I could if I understood russian. That russian thread is a good knowledge source.
About the pattern, that is just an observed pattern. There is no real logic behind it. People have observed it happening over the years. Many times it works but sometimes it doesn't.
what is the average number of spins to complete 13-31 pair?
Never analyzed it completely. I don't have the required tools and it is impossible to do it manually.
I will search ru forums to get more info on this. |
Some interesting spins today:
24, then 12, then 24, less than an hour difference.
11 then 11, both spins together (Like 10 minutes between one and the other).
The 31 and 13 I mentioned earlier, now the ball landed on 31 again.
Coincidence? I doubt it.
I think that is enough proof for me, I'll keep analyzing and decide if I keep betting on those kinds of numbers.
With caution of course, losing money on Roulette is sad.
Ty Marine guy btw.
I feel it is necessary to add that even though Mirror Pattern works but there is no 100% guarantee.
So bet at your own risk :)
Of course. |
24, then 12, then 24, less than an hour difference.
11 then 11, both spins together (Like 10 minutes between one and the other).
The 31 and 13 I mentioned earlier, now the ball landed on 31 again.
Don't forget 0 and 00 |
It is just a coincidence, I have years of roulette experience on this site and I am sure that it does not work in the long term. 99.99% of people who bet on these end up losing a lot of gold.
if it's more than 20 then this "pair" is not real
Lol what? If it is less than 36 than it is a profit so if it is around 30 it is great.
I remember few months back I was analyzing number history somewhere ~2010 and it took many spins ~30 iirc to complete 13-31 pair.
And that is incredibly profitable :P |
if it's more than 20 then this "pair" is not real
Lol what? If it is less than 36 than it is a profit so if it is around 30 it is great.
well 20 was not the correct number that I meant. If it's 100% random, then the chance for the first "13" appears after 26th roll is 50%. So if the average is something around 25 then it means the so-called pattern is not that simple.
I see a lot bets on "straight up 13" right after 31, but then the next roll is 32, and a lot bet on "straight up 23", then hits. After that, nobody bet on 13 anymore although it has not appeared. So this must be a complicated patter, not simple pairs. |
So this must be a complicated patter, not simple pairs.
Yes, I completely agree with you, Liuker. People who win on these bets must bet on time when that "complex" algo should be following that "pattern" and at other times it gives different output. (Dont know how I could simplify this).
This is the reason why I dont really bet on roulette :)
However many times you will observe those numbers following this pattern. |
well 20 was not the correct number that I meant. If it's 100% random, then the chance for the first "13" appears after 26th roll is 50%. So if the average is something around 25 then it means the so-called pattern is not that simple.
That doesn't make sense, because the chance is only 50%, but when you take an average it's based on numbers that dropped 100%, so as long as the average is around 30 it's great.
Anyway trust me it is just coincidence, and the only people bet on mirrors is because mirrors are cool :P It has been like this ever since this game started lol. |
| So russians that have lost millions cannot read at all. |
| So russians that have lost millions cannot read at all or lazy! |
I see a lot bets on "straight up 13" right after 31, but then the next roll is 32, and a lot bet on "straight up 23", then hits. After that, nobody bet on 13 anymore although it has not appeared. So this must be a complicated patter, not simple pairs.
Yes, It seems to me that the numbers are connected to each others regarding their location on the table. As you said, when the current roll is 13, playing sixlines or streets around 31 is quite often successful. I'm not a big gambler but this is the way I play when I do play. |
What you guys are doing here is numerology. Absolutely zero scientific evidence, only based on what catches your eyes' attention. Sentences like Many times it works but sometimes it doesn't or quite often successful
Thing is, you don't immediately see the beauty of pairs like 7-28, 41-43...
Go back to strategies minimizing betting losses, it's the only thing worth doing. The rest is pure fiction and misleading for everyone. |
What you guys are doing here is numerology
Such fatalism.
By "quite often successful", I mean the chances to win playing this way are superior than playing sixlines randomly (superior to 6/38).
Ok there's no absolute scientific proof, but you have to admit it must be something deeper than "strategies minimizing betting losses".
I assume that every scientist studies start from observations, and that is a matter of feelings |
for Hammer Thrower:
At least in my opinion it doesn't make a difference, you can't possibly find patterns in a random number generator unless you hack it. |
you can't possibly find patterns in a random number generator unless you hack it.
As MarineBiologist said, a number generator does not roll randomly in the natural way as we see it.
Hacking a generator means that I can deduce what is the next roll considering the last ones for me. It can't be that way of course, unless someone find an algorithm.
But considering the behavior of this generator, you can possibly increase your chances by observing some usual patterns. I'm just talking about probabilites. |
for Hammer Thrower:
no, there is nothing deeper.scientists have already studied roulette for the last two hundred years and today's computers have a very secure random generator in their cpu instruction set. programming languages have already functions to create unbiased results. |
today's computers have a very secure random generator in their cpu instruction set
Go tell this to these guys on the top of this list :
http://www.guildofheroes.ru/players.php?levelst=1&levelfin=21&male=1&female=1&sort=29&napr=1&cla n_id=-1&submit=%EF%EE%E8
I am believing what I see, and do not tell me this is just about luck having a profit of +10 millions when you can't bet more than a dozen of K golds at the same time. |
I'm betting on "conspiracy theory", "admin", "hacking" will be used in the next posts.
:o) |
