Forums-->General game forum--> 1|2|3|4|5|6|7
Author | Sion and cantbstopped deliberately ruin ambushes!!!!!!!!!!!! |
if 1 vs 2 thief hunting becomes a trend, admins may decide to evaluate the case as a violation of general rules 2.3 and start to punish those PAIRS.
after all, thief invitation is one of their valuable asset to gain donations.
If players decide thieving is UNDOABLE due to time syncronised walkers, it would be admins loss.
its not a defined crime (yet).
They do not respect other people's time and willing to play.
few shows respect to other players needs /time/etc.
unfortunately, thats life.
if sion (a kind player, always returns ambush gold etc)
and
CBS (keeper, lvl 15 on both com and .ru)
is using this -nasty- tactic, that definetly shows they have an issue with some1, poor ziu is only coleteral damage. | Come on
Loosing an ambush is just nothing and has no effect on game.
I've lost thousands of them and I'm still here.
How can a pair make ambush impossible.
There are nearly 100 lvl 15 and most of them are thieves so one ambush here and there is just nothing.
Will you complain as well against those traveling full arts ? | + | But if someone decided to grab someones gold, why dont others shouldn't kick his back.
with over 10 times cost? that's interesting point | for com lvl 15, imagine if 10 pairs decides to use that tactic or .ru, 100 pairs every level.
It will have an impact on the game, thieving/buying TGI will become less popular in long run.
walking Full Art or even with enhance is a choice of some rich players, no need (or right) to complain about them. Sometimes they give us caravans sometimes gives us 1 hour rest.
I've lost thousands of them and I'm still here.
assume you lose more than one per day as 2 vs 1, how u feel about that ?
wont you simply stop ambushing until that hunter pair get seperated ?
if 10 pairs doing that, what u would do ? |
It will have an impact on the game, thieving/buying TGI will become less popular in long run.
Same effect for walking Full Art or even with enhance, which is way more common than 2 vs 1.
And to me, I'd rather see 2 min ap vs 1 (me) than see 1 full art. Even if you lose to 2 players, you will get decent fsp, and if you win (happened to me several times before), you'll get excellent award of exp and fsp, which is kinda nice. But when you are defeated by a full art player, you almost get nothing and you'll definitely lose | with over 10 times cost? that's interesting point
who said it is profitabla, that is called justice | for latawica:
who said it is profitabla, that is called justice
lol. Give me a break. | who said it is profitabla, that is called justice
That's not justice, as a senior member of our thieves' guild, that's a betrayal of our guild! A betrayal of our leader's trust! | if you win (happened to me several times before)
elves are awesome, I can never beat 2 min AP player - unless at least one missed setup or/or some turns - when my ambush is set with min AP.
definetely agree about better fsp relative to FA thief buster. | $49
pfff, maybe you should give up after being cought? | for selfist:
unless at least one missed setup or/or some turns
that's exactly what happened when I won those battles, otherwise I can't win either. but the thing is if they are not doing this purposely, it's quite likely that one of them will go afk...
pfff, maybe you should give up after being cought?
lol of course not --- and who would like to be defeated? But at least I prefer to play a fair game with min ap or no art for fun and cost effectiveness, and I wont consider defeating a thief as a "honor" | Thief battle is unpredictable. Both thief and victim never know what will happen. So don't say about fair game. |
Thief battle is unpredictable. Both thief and victim never know what will happen. So don't say about fair game.
I agree, it's not like CG battles. However Full Art vs min ap is definitely unfair
I used to catch thieves before, but then I stopped, because I figured that every time you killed a thief with full art, you are in someone's black list. People come here to play games and make friends, but not to raise enemy. | got this from lexa's info:
Baron's Theorem
Hate is good. This is because conflict drives the formation of social bonds and thus of communities. It is an engine that brings players closer together.
Actualy FA players tend to get into everyone's friend list, and clicked a lot, barons theorem sorta works :p
i.e. latawica has the top priority between my friends - especialy after teaching me some (unwritten) game rule for a cheap price of 10k :p | I like it how it is :)
Thiefing shall not be easy. Many people still think that its a free win when facing humans in an ambush, why not teach them wrong?!
Thiefing has great benefits for the ambusher, so why not for their victims? Even though the victims seem to have to organise themselves to have a benefit, since the so long introduced "helping monks" never really showed up.
In case you know that you have to do a potential dangerous journey, wouldn't you try to back up somehow?
And since the thievery is really booming here, why not travel with a bodyguard in these threatening times?
Even in Real life you have stuff like that, just ask a few embassies ;) | i.e. latawica has the top priority between my friends - especialy after teaching me some (unwritten) game rule for a cheap price of 10k :p
U mean that unwritten vulagar PM after fight? dont put your dirty stuff on public please
However Full Art vs min ap is definitely unfair
What so sure that thief will not be in full ap? Many times i was thiefing in full arts and so do many others players. So yes, i dont think it is unfair travaling full arted (still having in mind that fight will be unpredictable). Maybe go to I&S and try to introduce rule - everybody thiefing in min ap and then traveling in fill would be unfair for sure.
If something isn't prohibited it is aloved.
I figured that every time you killed a thief with full art, you are in someone's black list
Many times i was killed by full arted travller and noone of them is on my blacklist.
Maybe you guys taking this game to seroius. Blacklist...omg | Maybe you guys taking this game to seroius.
if you are not taking this game too serious, then why would you care so much about such ambushed thing that you need to spend over 1.5k to defeat a thief? Everyone arguing on this forum is taking this game very serious, you have to admit.
We can discuss whether is appropriate to travel in full -- and I can't say it's inappropriate, however given most thieves set ambush in min ap, if you still think you are expecting a fair game when travel in full, I don't want to argue about this anymore. | Yes, there is no sence to talk about it(argue is a strong word). At least now i know on what i will spend my gold. | So... What i'll happen with both was doing that?
If keep with that, most probbaly everyone i'll copy this, and not only 2 people will do this, but 4 and 6,8,10,16,20,30... and keep going on... And when we notice thieving will be more hard than it already is...
If have anything can give a advantage so everyone will explore it, it's the natural course, everyone wants wins for sure.
But if everyone take advantage of this, not a good balance will happen to all.
Some people can agreed with "Oh they are thieves, they want stolem we gold, they have no honour using full ap agains't no ap players," but if you think about if they can thieving 2 agains't one, and you be the victim, you really don't gonna enjoy that, and will complain about.
I'm just surprise, because a keeper should make everyone more fair and corretly, abuse of a unfair type of fight. |
1|2|3|4|5|6|7Back to topics list
|