About the game
News
Sign in
Register
Top Players
Forum
21:31
4719
 online
Authorization required
You are not logged in
   Forums-->General game forum-->
1|2|3|4|5|6|7

Author.ru vs. .com
hunt records for a given level - everything is higher on .com.

ha-ha. Nice joke.
for Innerren:
Your sense of humor escapes me, but I'm glad I gave you a good laugh.
hmmm - hunt records, let's see ....

level 14 titans: com - 457, ru - 378
level 14 giants: com - 479, ru - 1214
....

seems there are good hunters on both servers :))
level 14 giants: com - 479, ru - 1214

Yeah, because our hunters also have 27%+ enchants for air, water, earth, and fire, 1+ min-max damage, 60% (I think that was what the 60 meant.. sorry if I'm wrong) + damage against neutrals, and 41 (!!!) attack. I couldn't tell what the defense was, but it was probably also high.

That was only the record, as I didn't check the other battles, but I think the better arts might have helped the RU players achieve higher records.
We have harder hunts, because our best hunter-set is GH.
They have this ''Suite St. John's wort'' (translated)
http://www.heroeswm.ru/help.php?section=40

It gives +60% damage and has better arts overall.
In addition to 45:
http://www.heroeswm.ru/art_info.php?id=sh_spear
http://www.heroeswm.ru/art_info.php?id=sh_4arrows
http://www.heroeswm.ru/art_info.php?id=sh_bow

It isn't that's hard to be preffered by our (rasistic?) admins.
Silly dispute. And silly to compare results of hunting. I have easily taken today the third place in hunting for magicians though I do not have furies and I played ugly. random)
47:

I had a look about your hunt. You won it mostly by luck (as 1st and 2nd ones), because you got only two stacks of magi. And shrews wouldn't have helped you much against those magi, they'd have died before hitting any mages (unless with some more luck again).
I about it also wrote. If to judge on this hunting th the bad hunter. Still has right at the beginning made the roughest mistake. Has simply strongly carried. But the third place is, and who knows, how many still will be.
The Polish fantast Sapkowski has written well: the best soldiers are easy for finding, they lie on the nearest cemetery
hmmm - hunt records, let's see ....

level 14 titans: com - 457, ru - 378
level 14 giants: com - 479, ru - 1214
....

seems there are good hunters on both servers :))


Comparing hunts at level 14 is the worst possible comparison, because level 15+ haven't been implemented here. It means any level 14 record on .ru will be beaten here eventually, simply because level 14 characters here can't level up anyway.

Comparison of hunt records for earlier levels is certainly more telling. But I admit my statement is out of date, it was based on a study made by MasterTI one year ago. Since then, .ru got tons of events (pushing people up with lower Hunters' Guild ratings) and more importantly a brand new Supreme Hunter artifact set. It means that as it stands now, any .ru player can beat a .com hunt record if he really wishes so.

As for any other comparison (saying one server is better than the other in group battles, etc.), these are absolutely baseless. The only thing that might be - or could have been - discussed for a valid comparison are the hunt records.
Im the king ru and .com boi
write me if u wanna go 1on1
i noticed when i played on it before lvl8 i was able to win14/15 my 2vs2 no matter who was partner(i never understood my partner or enemy) and with less ap.i was orc btw.tough was best time with this game at russia but it never beats enghlis language.whats the point of multiplayer game if you dont get anyone :p
kotrin) you contradict yourself) "no comparison,cause *ru players have better hunter set...", but "only thing that can be compared is hunts". funny... and concerning pvp)my experience in pvp is vice a versa to *ru...here players are less experienced..i`m not talking about newbies, i mean players 8-10 lvl...i don`t know what is on lvl 11+,but i suppose the situation doesn`t differ too much..that`s my imho.
54. Read the full statement by Kotrin before you discard it. Use a translator or something. His arguments are pretty logic but the whole idea of what players of what server are better is just empty and dull.

Bigger pool of players logically means more bad players and more pros(call them nerds from now on:-)). But the fact of the matter that at this server, without any admins attention, less arts, more expensive elements, cheaters running around you gotta REALLY love the game to stay.

We may have less events than .ru, but we love the game even more. :-)
Your sense of humor escapes me, but I'm glad I gave you a good laugh.

My humor based on bullshit that you wrote about HG records. Because only a few HG records are better than .ru here. Moreover most part of the great HG records here were made by players from .ru.

We may have less events than .ru, but we love the game even more. :-)

Applause!
When our server was young (only several months) we had exactly the same game as .ru and we could compare hunt records (Russian server had big advantage of course, because 1) had much more players, 2) was much older).

Now there is nothing to compare, all hunt records on Russian server has to be much better, because players on Russian server:
- have much better artifacts
- can buy elements very cheap
- have much more players


Let's look at the history (now those records are obsolete of course, but we can't change history):

Below is my letter to Nereid (2008-10-19):

Nobody in Russian server has 31 records (and 21 1st places) in 6th level all factions table.
I can easily improve many of my records myself, but I have no experience left.
Several my records are better than in Russian server despite the fact that Russian server runs much longer:

Giants: 17 (my record) vs 8 (1st place on Russian server)
Rocs: 84 (my record) vs 65 (1st place on Russian server)
Senior genies: 67 (my record) vs 43 (1st place on Russian server)
Griffins: 181 (my record) vs 163 (1st place on Russian server)
Wolf Raiders: 407 (my record) vs 378 (1st place on Russian server)
Giant lizards: 297 (my record) vs 228 (1st place on Russian server)
Crossbowmen: 271 (my record) vs 242 (1st place on Russian server)
Lizard cubs: 263 (my record) vs 252 (1st place on Russian server)

And some of my records are the same:
Unicorns: 67 (my record) vs 67 (1st place on Russian server)
Genies: 77 (my record) vs 77 (1st place on Russian server)
Cerberi: 228 (my record) vs 228 (1st place on Russian server)
Rebels: 1098 (my record) vs 1098 (1st place on Russian server)


Nereid can dig his mailbox and can confirm this info.
.ru vs. .com
RU wins!
Having better HG records over .ru doesn't mean that .com players are better than .ru .
Easy, .ru having a larger player base and more tournaments had better way to get exp than via hunt.
Another point that imho .com has more players playing when is the "european night" and they cant find pvp at that time so they have to hunt.
55. read my statement with a translator if u need) i know english quite good to understand and write in it without dictionaries or translators...and ktrin really contradicted herself about hunt records...just read my words one more time mb u`ll understand them)

57. bravo! really funny) a skilled player makes a char 6 lvl and just makes some hunt records. but in *ru 99% of chars 1-8 are just newbies. they jump through levels cause there are tonns of exps on events and in pvps and they have low guilds and often no money and no skill to make such records.and more often no will to do so) hunt records should be compared from lvl 12+ i`d say. then u`ll see the difference.
1|2|3|4|5|6|7
Back to topics list
2008-2024, online games LordsWM